Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Politicians are considered to be people's representative, selected by the people, and for the people. These elected representative of people are assumed to be working for the betterment of society as a whole without personal ground of bias. However, every politican is bind to some belief system, following certain principles and moral ideologies which are elusive and very confound for many of us to understand. The prompt posit that the Politicians should beholden to the common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. Will the congrous situation be ever possible without pursuing the common ground?The purpose of a politician will ever be fullfilled if they cannot meet people's expectation? are they hope of elusive ideals and ideology or their people who chose them? In my opinion, i am completely consonant with the idea that an eminient politician only succeed if he/she look at their ground and not misdriven by the whimsical ideals and ideologies because of two major reason.
To begin this, an ideal politician will only help create a congrous situation in the country if he is based on the ground belief. For an instance if a politician of any party will get elected to the government but if he is not compromising his personal belief and is very intransigent about the political ideology rather than the consensus brought by other party in forum.Thus it will lead to a chaotic situation where unsound politics will result disharmony among the leaders in politics, eventually causing failure in the system of government. The above illustrated example clarifies that being instransigent to certain idea abhorring and detesting the consensus defending owns ideals will hinder the peace and convivial environment of country which certainly will not be advantegous to politicians and people.
Further, the politician are bound to people as they are beholded by the vote of people, idealizing them as an individual on whom the poeple has high hope on for the change. And the voice of common people is only heard if one is willing to pursue common ground. The politician major purpose is to make the voice of common people audible to the concerned authority so his purpose will only be fullfilled if he advocate people instead of some confound ideals.The problems are seen on the common ground if we thoroughly observe rather than focusing on the ideals and his ideology. Moreover, ideology has been created many years ago by some selected people but the contemporaary situation might not want such harsh ideology and is not time relevant so he have to come to common agreement inorder to be trusted by many common people. Thus, above described position clearly underscore the importance of pursuing common ground in politics.
Of course, some argue that an ideals should always be followed like a cult by a true politician inorder to take bold and plucking decision. However, is there any worth of politician, if not trusted by his own people and is incapable to be reelected in any unfavorable circumstances in a forseeable future?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 621, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ible without pursuing the common ground?The purpose of a politician will ever be fu...
^^^
Line 1, column 714, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...f they cannot meet peoples expectation? are they hope of elusive ideals and ideolog...
^^^
Line 1, column 806, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...r people who chose them? In my opinion, i am completely consonant with the idea t...
^
Line 1, column 897, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'looks'.
Suggestion: looks
...nient politician only succeed if he/she look at their ground and not misdriven by th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ologies because of two major reason. To begin this, an ideal politician will ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...nsensus brought by other party in forum.Thus it will lead to a chaotic situation whe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nsensus brought by other party in forum.Thus it will lead to a chaotic situation whe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...advantegous to politicians and people. Further, the politician are bound t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'advocates'.
Suggestion: advocates
...s purpose will only be fullfilled if he advocate people instead of some confound ideals....
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... people instead of some confound ideals.The problems are seen on the common ground ...
^^^
Line 5, column 756, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ideology and is not time relevant so he have to come to common agreement inorder to ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pursuing common ground in politics. Of course, some argue that an ideals sho...
^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an ideal' or simply 'ideals'?
Suggestion: an ideal; ideals
...tics. Of course, some argue that an ideals should always be followed like a cult b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2564.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10756972112 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84964737309 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480079681275 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.7117884492 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.823529412 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5294117647 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202429703532 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082819254972 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674418103099 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12801102989 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583823362881 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.