The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Leaders are the representaive of mass people who talk and think about people for their betterment. A true leader can change the fortune of the people whom he/she is leading. For example, Malaysian priminister 'Mahatir Mohammad' whose bold leadership change Malaysia from economical point of view, structural point of view etc. and make Malaysia a developed country in short period of time.
Fome above example, we can find out what Mahatir did in his ruling period and why people had beleive in him again and again and made him priminister. Furthermore, recently he has become again the priminister of Malaysia as candidate of the party which was his own party but still won the election. It is because he has that interection with his countries people and always try to get some feedback from his people what made him popular not only to his country's people but also he beomes an real example of true leader.
On the contrary, we can consider dictetors who don't have any interaction with people and always do whatever they like without thinking about mass people. For example, Livian former president Gaddafi, Egyptian former president and off course Hitler, all of them didn't take any feedback from people whom they ruled. Moreover, they were full of arrogant and furious to the mass people.
leader should know the condition of the people, so he needs feedback. In the end, from above example we come out in a conclusion that best leaders of the world always encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e Malaysia a developed country in short period of time. Fome above example, we can find out...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... his countrys people but also he beomes an real example of true leader. On the ...
^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...contrary, we can consider dictetors who dont have any interaction with people and al...
^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...dent and off course Hitler, all of them didnt take any feedback from people whom they...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leader
...gant and furious to the mass people. leader should know the condition of the people...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, moreover, so, still, for example, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 257.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91439688716 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46335156958 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575875486381 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2728486789 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204123611399 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767101699926 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551303336638 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133765848356 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449110899582 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.