The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Argument is the statement that can be argued with others, and I mostly agree that convincing someone with an opposing viewpoint is suitable to verify an argument. However, in certain circumstances, there is no need to convince with others for argument verifying.
Admittedly, an argument can be clarified through discussion with opposite opinions. Furthermore, people tend to provide evidence and experiment result to persuade others. For instance, all of the candidates would debate in public during the election season in Taiwan. Most of the time, the voters are tend to be neutral because they may think confused about the policies proposed from those candidates. However, though the statements and the questions from opposite candidates, the audiences in front of the television can clarify their actual position in those politic statements since they understand the statements from different perspectives. Thus, an argument can convince someone with opposing viewpoints.
On the other hand, there are still remain some arguments do not need to convince someone through opposing viewpoint. In other words, some concept can be totally believe from others without providing supporting details, such as religion. To be frankly, people find their religious believes based on the peaceful and spiritual experience during worship. They visit temples or churches periodically to calm their complex mind and thoughts. It is religion make them believe in themselves and share with others. In addition, this in not necessary to provide any facts and opposing viewpoint to convince their belief in god. In these circumstances, the concepts of belief would not need any opposing viewpoint to strengthen the position of the argument.
In conclusion, based on the discussion above mentioned, I agree that an argument in most of the cases, such as policy, can convince others with an opposing viewpoint. However, my position excludes the argument in all of the religions because people can accept the concept of spirit without verifying.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...esult to persuade others. For instance, all of the candidates would debate in public durin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...aiwan. Most of the time, the voters are tend to be neutral because they may think co...
^^^^
Line 6, column 36, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
.... On the other hand, there are still remain some arguments do not need to convince ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ngthen the position of the argument. In conclusion, based on the discussion abo...
^^
Line 8, column 214, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r, my position excludes the argument in all of the religions because people can accept the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
frankly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49681528662 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83942872261 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506369426752 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0664328781 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.529411765 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286263645079 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108600479731 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114770359529 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224554773277 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938491865618 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.