Leadership in today's day and age is not just about a person's innate skills. It also includes public response and support for the leadership and that may require one to deliberately inculcate certain traits. The prompt states that in order to make a young adult ready to take on leadership roles, importance of a sense of cooperation supersedes that of competition. In my opinion, while both are imperative, a competitive attitude is more essential to be a successful leader for the following reasons.
Firstly, the world is increasingly becoming more fast paced and people are adopting the "hustle culture" more than ever before. The age to shape one's life is now the prime twenties, which is a significant shift from the past situation. Consequently, it is a given that the world outside is brutally competitive, and in order to be a successful leader one must be appropriately equipped to survive in that competition. For instance, the booming start up culture amongst young adults clearly depicts how a company can easily perish if the leadership is not fit to compete with others in the space. Research has consistently shown that a laid- back attitude towards competitors can cause takeovers or bankrupcy, as was the case for the food delivery app Uber Eats in India. Hence, to say that a sense of competition is essential to get a true picture of the real- world problems, would not be an overstatement.
Further, a sense of competition can approriately act as a galvanizing agent, pushing the youth to do their level best. Healthy competition should be encouraged, while also making sure that it is kept under check and to not create a toxic work environment. To further the previous example, had Uber Eats recognized their competition in Zomato and taken the challenge head-on, the company would have realised its strength in intra-state deliveries and capitalized on the same. However, due to a complacent attitude and style of leadership, the company failed to push back and prove their mettle, and were not fueled enough to capture the market. This instance only further demonstrates the importance of a competitive mindset.
Nevertheless, it is true that a sense of cooperation can help a leader in guiding their organisation to long term success. Needless to say, a leader who is not cooperative towards his/ her employees, teammates, customers and competitiors will sooner or later be driven out of the market. For instance, one need look no further than Apple and its perennial success, owing to Steve Jobs' leadership. Apple is one of the best companies to work at in the world due to its company culture of promoting cooperation and mutual respect. Admittedly, if the company had not been humble enough to cooperate with large competitors such as Samsung and Google, even when these companies were performing better in the market, Apple would have been a long gone name. Thus, it can be said without a doubt that cooperation too is an essential leadership trait.
In conclusion, as seen from the above- mentioned discussion, there is no definitive answer to this claim. Of course there are some people who believe that cooperation is of utmost importance and a leader cannot be effective in its absence. However, it is clear that without a competitive attitude, cooperation will just be treated as a weakness and will be taken for granted by others in the real world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...in todays day and age is not just about a persons innate skills. It also includes public ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...more than ever before. The age to shape ones life is now the prime twenties, which i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2834.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00706713781 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97633077275 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514134275618 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 908.1 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4802725888 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161550849468 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459034331601 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275808567167 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947685357 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184290784446 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.