The best way for a society to prepare its young people for
leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by
instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you
agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting
your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons
or examples that could be used to challenge your position
The topic for the leadership whether should be focused on the cooperation or the competition is dubious one. While, some may argue that the leadership on the government, industry, or other fields should be based on the cooperation, I believe that thne leadership should be based on the competition. Often the best results on the major field are attained by the competition. This doesnot mean that the young people should be guided without cooperation. But without competition, it is hard to attain the desirable leader. One has to face the struggle and the hard work to be successful leader.
Children on their home are taught by their parents which is followed by the schools and the colleges. During that time the student have to face many competitions to enter on the typical schools, colleges and the univertsities. Often the students have to take a lot of standardised tests before he/she gets admission on the suitable one. Core students on the top universities get entry through the competition, not by cooperation.
In addition to this, the leaders for the goverment are selected through the election by making the competition . Public, the voters, are allowed to select the leaders through the election. The candidsate with hope from the public often wins the election and the desired leader is attained by the nation. On contrary to this, some countries like Nepal has the option to select few members on the general assembly by the selection from different fields without competition, by the cooperation betweeen the poilitical parties. The numbers are quite less as compared with the election process.
Moreover the leaders from the worldwise leading companies like Sundar Pichai for the CEO of Apple company and the Satya Nadela for the Microsoft company have provided thge best examples of leaders which are today by the competition.
For these reasons it is clear that the best way to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them in the sensew of competition, not cooperation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h the election by making the competition . Public, the voters, are allowed to sele...
^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...cal parties. The numbers are quite less as compared with the election process. ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... compared with the election process. Moreover the leaders from the worldwise leading ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10650887574 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82338333577 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0926412817 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.529411765 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22526528628 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666605910339 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988266296874 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14957999871 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141669582148 0.0667264976115 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.