The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Preparing young people for leadership and making sure they get adequet training is extremely crucial for a society. Therefore, the best way to identify and improve the skills that make a good leader in the youth should be investigated. Throughout history, the best leaders have been the ones who had not only superior intellectual capabilities, but also better interpersonal skills. Best leaders know how to inspire people and bring them together. Cooperative leaders who use resources that they are provided with tend to be more successful than the competitive ones. Thus, training young people to be more cooperative could contribute to making them better leaders.
There are a variety of skills and characterisitics that make a person suitable for a leadership position in any field, for instance government, industry and education system. A competent leader knows how to bring people together and enable them to use their unique abilities to contribute to the team. An example of this concept in a relatively small domain could be team leaders of a school project. Often, the most successful teams are the ones that have more cooperative leaders who effectively communicate with all members and facilitates their collaboration. Therefore, it is essentail for the future leaders to be adept cooperators.
On the other hand, there are competitive leaders who want to prove themselves to their team or constantly strive to make their team better than all the other ones. It is irrefutable that a degree of competitiveness could lead to better results, as more competitive people have greater motivation to grow and supersede others. In a team setting, however, too much competitiveness from the side of the leader could be rather detrimental for the team. Leaders whose sole purpose is to make their team or nation the best one, could easily forget the needs, welfare and hapiness of the people, making the rivalry counter-productive. Young future leaders should be made aware of this fact.
To conclude, in order to guarantee having competent future leaders, every society should pay extra attention to how the leaders are being prepared. Great interpersonal skills including cooperativeness should be taught to the youth rather than focusing on making them more competitive. As the best leaders are the ones who motivate the people and facilitate their collaboration instead of trying to take care of everything single-handedly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Best'.
Suggestion: The Best
..., but also better interpersonal skills. Best leaders know how to inspire people and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30749354005 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06830762495 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49354005168 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5013167404 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.105263158 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154497059214 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599807539417 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480282442105 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107694643108 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416559018064 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.