The best way for a society is to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The growth of the young is susceptible to the teachings professed to them early on. These teachings shape the character and future of the youth in society. This prompt recommends societies to instill in today's young generation, a sense of cooperation instead of competition. In my opinoin, I disagree with this suggestion to restrict competition for three reasons.
To begin, one of the major factors that prepares youth to excel is competition, which provides an aim that motivates them. For instance, when a young candidate is striving to gain leadership in a government post and has competition for this, they push themselves to their limits and promise better services to the public to gain favour in voting. This enhances the output of the leader and works for the betterment of the society. As illustrated by the example above, competition imbibes in the young, a sense of willingness to do better, and it would improvise the output of all industries.
To add to this, young leaders should be provided of a methodology to be aware of their performance so that they can evaluate themselves. Let us say a student who leads a team in answering a quiz. If scores weren't provided and teams weren't compared, how would the team know of their performance? If a team scores poorly in a quiz, they would continue to do so, as they are unaware of their failures. If they were notified of their performances, they would spend extra time in preparation and favourably achieve better results. This example depicts how a lack of competition would create a sense of unawareness, and would obscure the performances of the young, leading to poorly developed leaders of the future.
Further, even if we give increased importance to cooperation, why do competition and cooperation have to supplant each other? Society should promote both of these prinicples, which are of concordant importance. For example, for young leaders of the sports council of different houses of the school, competition should be encouraged by arranging inter-house events to push the youth to lead their houses better with the trophy as bait. Hand in hand, when these same leaders represent their schools together, they are bound to cooperate with each other to improve the efficacy and performance of their team. The above example conveys how young leaders can be trained to incoroporate both cooperation and competition, which would lead to a better overall development.
Of course, some would argue that competition would result in dispute among young leaders. However, what is the point of avoiding dispute when the leaders are themselves not delivering on funcamental requirements? The cohesion of cooperation and competition, can develop precocious individual into the best furute leaders of our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...s a team in answering a quiz. If scores werent provided and teams werent compared, how...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...iz. If scores werent provided and teams werent compared, how would the team know of th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... as they are unaware of their failures. If they were notified of their performance...
^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
.... For example, for young leaders of the sports council of different houses of the scho...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, for example, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16150442478 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95310394185 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4780798459 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.045454545 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230773522468 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656347975627 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550475000473 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140252483157 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712279317277 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.