The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Some people claim that cooperation is necessary to prepare young people for leadership in government, industry, etc. Other people are sure that competition is the best way to do this. Undoubtedly, the statement given is rather controversial; moreover, the discussion of that statement is necessary because the leaders make the future of our countries - our future. Nevertheless, a closer examination reveals that cooperation is the best solution to prepare youths for being leaders.
First of all, working in cooperation helps people to learn from one another. Once you don't know an answer to some question, you can always ask your co-workers: the possibility that one of them will have an answer is relatively high. Moreover, you can always learn how to resolve some problems and develop new methods. Why does studying in schools and universities involve much group work? Why do policemen collaborate while dissolving cases? Why do scientists prefer doing research together? The reason is that cooperation lets people find answers and solutions more quickly and make new discoveries. That's why cooperation is necessary: new leaders will be able to work together; therefore, the society will be better off from the leaders' great decision-making.
Another reason is that cooperation teaches people to be patient and tolerant. One of the most important things in our lives is an ability to work and get along with other people. If you cannot maintain a stable relationship with others, you will not become a great leader. Nowadays politics is quite important: governments of distinct countries resolve many problems in collaboration; sometimes, one country corroborates another one. Imagine a leader who cannot find an approach to other politicians: such person will make his country politically weak, which will worsen its citizens' living standards as these standards partly depend on the international relationship.
Competition has some advantages, too. While competing, young people have a strong motivation to become better and more powerful than other youths. That may result in qualified and steadfast leaders with great knowledge who can defend his/her point of view. However, competition may lead to unfavorable consequences: some people can have an incentive to play unfairly. For instance, cheating on exams while studying in the university, or betraying other people. That's how the competition can become harmful.
Finally, cooperation may help young people to make new acquaintances. When you work in a team, you get a possibility to make friends with a plenty of professionals who may be familiar with your teammates. It is widely known that more people bring more useful connections. That's the reason why collaboration with anyone may cause to a favorable outcome.
Once there are arguments to be made for both sides, it is particularly clear that collaboration would help young people to become excellent leaders. Maybe, if the real leaders had practiced such an approach, the world could have been more peaceful than it is in the present days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ple to learn from one another. Once you dont know an answer to some question, you ca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...men collaborate while dissolving cases? Why do scientists prefer doing research tog...
^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... more quickly and make new discoveries. Thats why cooperation is necessary: new leade...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... university, or betraying other people. Thats how the competition can become harmful....
^^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e people bring more useful connections. Thats the reason why collaboration with anyon...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2591.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3755186722 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99745057541 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522821576763 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4127221974 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3448275862 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6206896552 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65517241379 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169994156466 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482276483105 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770858095988 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991342681209 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921751069778 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.