The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Some people claim that the well-being of society can tell whether a country’s leaders are efficient or not. Other people are sure that it is not the main factor of the leaders’ effectiveness. Undoubtedly, the statement given is rather controversial; hence, we should pay attention to that topic as the well-being of society can be measured as one of the most important things in the world. A closer examination reveals, that a country’s leaders’ effectiveness is mostly determined by the well-being of citizens; though, I agree with the statement given.
First of all, if the country’s population has high living standards, it means that the government is able to maintain land’s economy and distribute goods among people effectively. Moreover, the well-being of society is also determined by the country’s politics. When a county is powerful, rich and friendly towards other countries, such a strategy will definitely help it to allocate more resources. Stable economy and adequate politics will encourage many foreign investors to bring their money to the country. For instance, a strong stock exchange would become a pleasant opportunity to invest. More investment means more money for the country’s citizens. To exemplify, we can consider developing and developed countries. Developed countries have a stable economy, low rate of unemployment and people are sure about their future lives. Of course, the efficient ruling of these countries’ leaders led to this outcome. Considering developing countries, we can say that politicians are not able to maintain their responsibilities; that resulted in a lower quality of people’s lives.
Another point to be made is that well-being of society can help to determine whether governments are corrupt or not. When leaders steal from people, society’s well-being worsens. It can be proved by some examples. For instance, the most corrupt countries in the world are located in Africa (Zimbabwe, Zambia, Yemen, etc.). If we look at statistics, we can see that the quality of African countries’ citizens’ life is the worst. Of course, corruption is not the only factor of the well-being of society; however, it makes a huge part of it. Nevertheless, if the country’s government is honest and does its best, then the well-being of society will undoubtedly become better.
Of course, sometimes the effectiveness of a country’s leaders is not determined by the well-being of its citizens. We can consider a scenario when a country’s economy was in a deep crisis, so the previous leaders gave up their power. New politicians may be particularly efficient; however, due to the state of the country’s economy, they couldn’t make the well-being of society way better in such short time. However, in that case, the effectiveness can be measured according to statistical data, such as changes in GDP per capita or expenditure on health care.
Finally, the well-being of society cannot be made better by itself. It always requires government’s intervention. New roads, hospitals, schools, etc. are always a product of leaders’ decision-making. That’s why we can say that the leaders may be efficient if such commodities are built in the country.
Once there are arguments to be made for both of sides, it is quite clear that the statement given is true: we can evaluate leaders’ effectiveness according to the well-being of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...d in Africa Zimbabwe, Zambia, Yemen, etc.. If we look at statistics, we can see th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, well, for instance, in fact, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.5258426966 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2951.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 539.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47495361781 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44056664494 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474953617811 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 901.8 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7339726451 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1935483871 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3870967742 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93548387097 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57391636874 0.243740707755 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172065186264 0.0831039109588 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136556203387 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351875180268 0.150359130593 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101521999497 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.