To discuss the argument, first we must define what constitutes well-being of citizenry in any nation. Well-being includes safety, good health intertwined with technological advance and a sustaining economy. Most of these factors are imposed on people of a society or a country by its government ruled by the leaders. Although leaders from other areas,such as scientific, philosophical and many more fields also contribute substantially but without the political leaders seminal support this would not be possible. Thus, the status of the people - good or bad - comes from the roots of the leadership.
Both the history and contemporary times resonates many evidences to prove this argument. For one, the nation's financial institutions with its well educated and decisive leadership contributes to the growth of society by increasing the welfare and standard on living of its people. For instance, countries like US, UK are some of biggest global economies in the world achieved this position through the astute of their leaders over many decades.Countries like Pakistan with its ineffective leadership still struggles to maintain their current economic status.
Secondly, health system is one of the most discerning factors that reflects the country's well-being. Britain's free health treatment since the last decade or two, provides us with a conspicuous example. This would not had been possible without the government financial and health ministries erudite in providing such facilities its people. This feat is not even undertaken by 10% of the countries in the world.
Although effective leadership clearly mirrors the well-being, there are cases where ineffective leadership does not impact the being of the people. For suppose, countries like Iran, Iraq and many such countries have dissolute governments but due to globalization, private institutions and organisations like UN have alleviated many sufferings of the people over the past decade, those people, at present lead a standard life.
Therefore, from the above stated analysis we could say that the effective leadership provides and even enhances the well-being of the people.
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 90
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , such
...aders. Although leaders from other areas,such as scientific, philosophical and many m...
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR
Message: The proper name in singular (UK) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
...le. For instance, countries like US, UK are some of biggest global economies in the...
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the biggest'.
Suggestion: of the biggest
...nstance, countries like US, UK are some of biggest global economies in the world achieved ...
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
...tute of their leaders over many decades.Countries like Pakistan with its ineffective lead...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58103975535 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01175470172 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593272171254 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6677486819 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143679414658 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050733466154 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301107241755 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840640622781 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017267880255 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.