The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."
I agree with the cooperation based approach.
Youth is a time in person's life where he learns lessons that he carries with him as a bundle of experience for the rest of his life. It is also the most crucial time for character building and as such, lessons learnt in one's youth are likely to have a direct and long-lasting impact on his behavioural pattern throughout his lifetime. Consequently, approach to teach leadership lessons in a person's youth can't be marginalized.
To categorize widely, there are two main approaches in which you can teach leadership lessons to a person- one is through instilling the feeling of competition, that is, the one where you tell him that all people are his competitors and one of the either has to lose in order for the other one to win in life, while the other one teaches leadership on a compassionate level, the one that teahces to respect everyone's needs in a society and achieve things as well as solve problems on a macro level rather than looking at problems merely from a self centred view.
One has to understand the interdependence of life and it's environment to appreciate the compassion-based aproach to leadership lessons. A person's happiness in the long run is greatly determined by the happiness of people living in his environment. To explain this point in greater detail, let's consider an example of a person who is a leader in his apartment building and hence has authority to decide if the apartment should have a separate play area designated for kids. The leader having no kids of his own and one who have been trained through the competition based aprroach looks at this as "other" people's issue or problem and hence takes a self centred call and denies the request of other society members who have kids. This helps him in the short run as there's no unnecessary money or time and energy spent on the construction of the play area. However, in the long run, there being no park for kids in the surroundings, parents start to bring kids to the common are for playing activities causing a lot of noise and incovenience to other members of the society and hence there is a lot of discord and disharmony in the apartment on a daily basis which makes the leader unhappy too in the long run. A compassionate leader on the other hand would have realised this earlier and hence would have come up with a solution keeping in mind needs of everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...building and as such, lessons learnt in ones youth are likely to have a direct and l...
^^^^
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...proach to teach leadership lessons in a persons youth cant be marginalized. To cate...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 406, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...h leadership lessons in a persons youth cant be marginalized. To categorize wide...
^^^^
Line 8, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...-based aproach to leadership lessons. A persons happiness in the long run is greatly de...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 774, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ids. This helps him in the short run as theres no unnecessary money or time and energy...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lier and hence would have come up with a solution keeping in mind needs of everyo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271523178808 0.240241500013 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.152317880795 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0684326710817 0.0880659088768 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0264900662252 0.0497285424764 53% => OK
Pronouns: 0.037527593819 0.0444667217837 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139072847682 0.12292977631 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0441501103753 0.0406280797675 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83456324652 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0331125827815 0.030933414821 107% => OK
Particles: 0.00220750551876 0.0016655270985 133% => OK
Determiners: 0.123620309051 0.0997080785238 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00883002207506 0.0249443105267 35% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0198675496689 0.0148568991511 134% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2425.0 2732.02544248 89% => OK
No of words: 424.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71933962264 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.299528301887 0.366273622748 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.23820754717 0.280924506359 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.134433962264 0.200843997647 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106132075472 0.132149295362 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83456324652 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 55.058758426 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 35.3333333333 23.380412469 151% => OK
Sentence length SD: 135.196667447 59.4972553346 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 202.083333333 141.124799967 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3333333333 23.380412469 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 0.674092028746 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 59.1540880503 51.4728631049 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.10204081633 1.64882698954 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350726670771 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165877393239 0.123202303941 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0717041821943 0.077325440228 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.649019792076 0.547984918172 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.187554332591 0.149214159877 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160106696622 0.161403998019 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608185100016 0.0892212321368 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.300903074032 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.166897543637 0.0692045440612 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210508094635 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886124344063 0.0653680567796 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.