The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The statement attempts to raise a discussion on a very important topic pertaining to the young population. Whether instilling a sense of cooperation or a sense of competition is the best way to prepare young people for the leadership roles of future? I personally feel that instilling a sense of cooperation is what prepares young people for future leadership roles. I would substantiate my claim with the reasons below.
Firstly, young people of the current generation who are addicted to competition don't bother about others. Victory is all they care about. This kind of mentality in the young minds of the country is very harmful both to the individual and to the country as a whole in the long run. Say a person who is very competitive becomes the leader of an industry. His ultimate and only goal would be to win over other industries. This is quite as expected from such person, because he was taught to do this from childhood. It's not a fault of the individual. He was taught to be competitive right from the beginning, and his behaviour was just a mirror to what he was taught. But is this the right behaviour to be portrayed when he is the leader? It is an undeniable fact that being competitive is necessary, but not to an extent that we mask other concerns over it. The leader must take all his member, subordinates together under an umbrella in time of distress and not get submerged in the sorrow of loss. Instilling a sense of competition prepares an individual as a "Solo Player" and not a "Team Player"
Secondly, a perfect leader is a person who takes every single aspect of the team into consideration, leaving aside his personal benefits. A competitve person, would have grown up in a scenario where his stature in the society and his benefits are all that matters. Let's consider an example, say a company is about to sign a contract with another company, and this contract is purely based on the personal interest of the leader. It would not benefit the company as a whole, but the employees in the company would have to work day and night for the deal. In this situation, an ideal leader who is instilled with a sense of cooperation would have consulted with his team and decided if it is a wise option for the team to take this deal up. But if it's the competitive leader, he would have gone ahead and signed the deal because he would have forseen personal benefit in the deal. That's the difference between a leader with a sense of cooperation and a leader with a sense of competition.
Most importantly, when young people who have been instilled with a sense of cooperation become our future leaders, be it governance, industry or any other field, they are bound to perform well. Reason being, they are aware of the behaviour expected from them. They know when to raise the temper and when to stay to calm. They are aware of when to question his subordinates and when to support them. This mentality grooms them into a charismatic leader.
Having given all these scenarios, I do agree that being competitive is necessary, but one must know to what extent he must be competitive and to what extent he must be cooperative. Pros of being a cooperative leader outnumbers that of a competitive leader. Hence it a wise decision for schools, parents and the society as a whole to instill cooperative behaviour in the young people of our country. </span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eration who are addicted to competition dont bother about others. Victory is all the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...e was taught to do this from childhood. Its not a fault of the individual. He was t...
^^^
Line 5, column 1058, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f competition prepares an individual as a 'Solo Player' and not a &apos...
^
Line 5, column 1092, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...al as a 'Solo Player' and not a 'Team Player' Secondly, ...
^
Line 9, column 266, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... and his benefits are all that matters. Lets consider an example, say a company is a...
^^^^
Line 9, column 747, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...r the team to take this deal up. But if its the competitive leader, he would have g...
^^^
Line 9, column 880, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e forseen personal benefit in the deal. Thats the difference between a leader with a ...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...utnumbers that of a competitive leader. Hence it a wise decision for schools, parents...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2859.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 598.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78093645485 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94510247834 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92687478571 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414715719064 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 905.4 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.8969491717 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46666666667 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25482632597 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722011873461 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10299891454 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160036486782 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100042359175 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.