All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The statement raises a major concern which has been haunting the management of many companies, both MNCs and Startups. The work a company does is very important for it to stay in the market for longer, but the internal operations of the company are equally important to keep the company stable and have a decorum established in the company. Many companies outsource this to consultants. They take inputs from consultants about how to operate a company. There are pros and cons to it. It is indisputable that taking the help of a consultant will give the company a work around the issue and the company will save some time in doing so. Nevertheless the disadvantages caused by this supersede advantages. I agree with the statement stating that the use of consultants to efficiently operate a company is unnecessary. I would substantiate my claim by providing a few reasons and examples.
Firstly, in any company, employees of the company are the one's who are the major stakeholders. They spend majority of the time working in the company. They are aware of what is wrong and what needs to be changed in the company. Let's consider an example: Assume that the employees in the company are frustrated by working for long hours, they need some mode of recreation. In this scenario, "Will the employees know the requirement better of a consultant who is not aware of the mental trauma employees are going through?" No doubt, employees of the company know what they need. If the consultant is a brainy person, he would as well come to the company and speak with a few employees and find out the issue and suggest a solution which is in favour of the employees. But when the management can take direct suggestions from their own employees, does it really make sense to pay a hefty amount to a consultant? Moreover, I would say that the employees would be even more happy if the company asks them for suggestions. They would get a feeling of involvement in company's operational matters.
Secondly, most of the consultants work with a generic plan. They have generic templates on to how to operate a company. When a company asks for a consultant's suggestion in any matter, they would find a generic solution to that problem from the template and provide it to them. This might work out to some extent with the company's requirement. But are all companies same? Defintely not. When the companies are not same, how can a generic plan work out for all companies. The operating of one company differs from another based on multiple factors such as diversity in the company, size of the company, budget of the company and many more things. As far as my understanding goes, the employees of the company are capable enough to take a call on the changes they require. That would be better than the generic plan which the consultant would suggest.
Thirdly and most importantly, these consultancies charge a huge amount for the work they do. If the companies manage to get this work done internally by taking inputs from their own employees, they would be saving a major chunk of the company budget. This part of budget can be constructively used for the benefit of the employees. Employees could be offered more incentives, goodies, team excursions and many other things. This would ensure employee satisfaction without using extra money from the company budget.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 636, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ompany will save some time in doing so. Nevertheless the disadvantages caused by this supers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...hat needs to be changed in the company. Lets consider an example: Assume that the em...
^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consultants'' or 'consultant's'?
Suggestion: consultants'; consultant's
...te a company. When a company asks for a consultants suggestion in any matter, they would fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2797.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 575.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86434782609 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80308984255 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 874.8 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6204627673 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.40625 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.96875 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406458023355 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113559538946 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756215024815 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284182799842 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231208703076 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.