The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
In any argument, one cannot have an effective debate without proper communication. One element that is vital to proper communication is the ability to listen to the counter argument and respond to their issues. It is a fact that in the future, the children of today will be our leaders in industry, government, and throughout society. Given this, it is important that we as a society foster a sense of understanding and cooperation that allow our youth to lead effectively, while also allowing competition to prepare them for the realities of life.
Leadership in government requires immense cooperation. Lawmakers are constantly collaborating with people that have different beliefs and viewpoints from their own. Despite any differences that a given Senator or Congressperson may have, at the end of the day laws are passed by these same individuals. For this reason, cooperation is a keystone value that these leaders depend upon to do their jobs effectively.
Even if the youth of today are taught the importance of cooperation in leadership roles, this is not the only way that stuff gets done in the real world. Industry especially presents challenges to cooperation given the flexibility of hierarchy that can differ company to company. For example, while collaboration allows people to recognize each issue presented equally, competition allows any and all ideas be presented, which can allow for new processes and thought to take place. Additionally, competition prepares future leaders for the reality of society because in real life, cooperation is not always going to work and competition can oftentimes take its place.
While the private sector differs in many ways from government, the required leadership and core values remain similar. In order for any businessperson to provide their good or service to society, they will inevitably have to work with others (be it manufacturers, clients, the public, etc.) just as government leaders must work with each other to enact laws. There is room for competition in the private industry, but cooperation is unavoidable because of the nature of our society. Businesses are not run by as well as profiting from a single person; they can be run by one person, but they rely on collaboration and interest of others.
For these reasons, collaboration is necessary, but competition is realistic and unavoidable. Leaders in every aspect of society benefit from and depend upon clear communication and effective collaboration. Competition may allow for productivity in some aspects, such as private industry, but given the negativity that can arise from competition, collaboration remains the keystone to effective leadership. The young people of today, our future leaders, will benefit from these values just as we see our current leaders benefiting today.
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 66
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 49
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 83
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes, which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated, are far more successful than are other methods at deterring che 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3595505618 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09883973872 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507865168539 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1094029174 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1904761905 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232165671916 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643705286986 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048748548109 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124491695938 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220706980157 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.