The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The best leaders are not the ones who work singlehandedly but those who push everyone around them to work together. In the words of Dr A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, "Today's students the nation's future". Essential Leadership values such as cooperation, empathy and veracity must be instilled into children from an early age when they are still impressionable. I strongly agree with the former stance of the prompt due to the following reasons.
Humans, in general, tend to perform better when working together. They are much more efficient and productive when they are not burdened with tasks and have a network of other humans who can help them. A leader should have the ability to delegate tasks by assessing each individual's capacity to fulfil them. One person's weakness can be overcome by another person's strength. For example, a military mission is assigned to a platoon of members. The leader must know how to communicate and cooperate with the other team members to ensure that the mission is a success. Even in Government fields, leaders have the responsibility of fulfulling public's demands but this cannot be done if they do not rely on the public and cooperate with them.
Teamwork is an essential quality that one cannot gain within a matter of a few days. It has to be taught, practiced for years for one to gradually build it. In sports, a team cannot win any matches unless all the players of a team cooperate with each other and remain in sync. For instance, let's say in a game of Basketball there are five members each on two teams. If a player on a team lacks in stamina, they can depend on their teammate to cover for them until they catch up. If a player is weak in their offense, they can count on their teammates to hold the ground until its time for defense. To defeat the other team, it is necessary that everyone on this team remains on the same page, acknowledge each other's weaknesses and are willing to pull through not for one's own sake but for the team. Because even if one player gets selfish and try to improve their own stats, it will result in the downfall of the team's coordination.
A leader must not feel avaricious in any circumstances to hog all the glory. It will affect the morale of the people and eventually the results. Having a competitive outlook is good because it makes us work harder and strive for a better outcome. But promoting competitiveness in students by pitting them against each other would be detrimental to the cause as they will imbibe a complicit sense of self. And that to win any kind of means is appropriate. This will further grow into malicious intent.
So for leaders to grow in a healthy environment it is necessary that they are subjected to environments where cooperation is promoted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ity to delegate tasks by assessing each individuals capacity to fulfil them. One persons we...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ons weakness can be overcome by another persons strength. For example, a military missi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs have the responsibility of fulfulling publics demands but this cannot be done ...
^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aknesses and are willing to pull through not for ones own sake but for the team. ...
^^
Line 5, column 916, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
..., it will result in the downfall of the teams coordination. A leader must not feel...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, in general, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72107438017 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69982035516 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7284315874 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6296296296 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9259259259 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25925925926 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221343925699 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519416546957 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494773819091 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110998726371 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341948728969 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.