The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
Young people are the face of future; they lead the country and build a legacy for further generations to come but the basis of their action and perspective must be installed with the sense of cooperation. The prompt thus mentions about the need of cooperation rather than competition which can be explained in the following ways.
First of all, leading a nation or a firm requires an exceptional vision and perspicacity along with a nature than regards justice for all. For example, the human right advocate Martin Luther King Jr. had a vision of creating a America which is free of racism and bias; he gave his legendary speech "I have a dream" which is imprinted in the history urging the people to live and work in cooperation, to fight for their in cooperation and coexist together. What can be understood from this gesture is no matter what the cause we are fighting for, though they might have some alternate ways to achieve so but the real notion for changing life and imprinting a better vision in the younger generation cooperation is must.
Secondly, being a human, its the primal duty of each individual to serve one another and that can only be possible through cooperating and coexisting. For example, the field of science is vague which not only instills the theories of physics but there coexists mathematics, biochemist, engineers and many of such. To launch a spaceship whom we see on the frontline are just the drivers of the craft but the real artist lies behind the scene which include experts from a diverse field. If people have not developed a sense of cooperating and coexisting then launching a spacecraft and learning the universe would have been nothing more but a junk pedants babbling their expertise.
However, a healthy competition is needed to uplift ones standard and situation which lead towards a positive change. But some society envisions their younger people with just this theory about being the best through knocking the others, this gesture will lead nowhere but into a frustrating condition where a mere failure can lead to a catastrophe. Healthy competition in politics where the opposition criticize the ruling government and warn about their fallings, similarly, healthy competition among the firms to produce the best product with the least price, etc. are supportive and effective cause they lead to positive outcomes.
To sum up, young people imitate what we do and what we feed them mentally with. A mere sense of cooperation can definitely change the vague concept of being the only best. It envisions with empathy and solidarity among the people which is the only way out to hatred and acrimony.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...uther King Jr. had a vision of creating a America which is free of racism and bia...
^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ion is must. Secondly, being a human, its the primal duty of each individual to s...
^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...healthy competition is needed to uplift ones standard and situation which lead towar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, then, thus, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2217.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97085201794 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66845629 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551569506726 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8560261978 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5625 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254735970059 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748202409638 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371028224587 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135282727781 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223027490323 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.