The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Society is higly responsible for developing personality of a young person. I agree to the fact that one of the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competion; because competitive environment can make a person a decent businessman, but to become a good leader it is very important to be collaborative in nature.
It can not be the only best way a good leader, because leadership also depends on many other skills. For example, a person can be good at cooperation but may be weak at time management or task prioritization. Only a person's cooperative skills doesn't justify his leadership skills. But yes, cooperation is very imperative aspect of leadership. Government, corporates and other fields demand for a collaborative youth. This sense of cooperation can be instilled by a society itself; a society is highly responsible for the environment that the youth of the nation is existing in. Again counterquestion to this can be: Is society solely responsible for developing sense of cooperation? The answer is no. But society can bring up the environment where a young person sees a leader cooperates with the another leader, rather than trying to slander and disparage the reputition of rivals. We see a society where leaders rant in public to damage opposition's reputation. Rather than quarreling among themselves and creating a competitive environment, can the youth of the nation see a environment where leaders come and work together in order to eradicate the onerous problems of the nation. Creating amiable environment can leave positive impact on the youth of the nation.
Corporate Managers often tend become competitive in the race of getting promotions, rather they can be good leaders which can inevitably leave a positive impact among the employees of the company. Having a competitive mindset may conspire the employees. Instead these managers should work together in a collaborative environment for the betterment of the nation. This is how a society can impact the leadership qualities of a young aspiring leader. Therefore, indeed the best way for society to create a leader is by creating a collaborative environment and not competitive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...management or task prioritization. Only a persons cooperative skills doesnt justify his l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tion. Only a persons cooperative skills doesnt justify his leadership skills. But yes,...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1075, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...onment, can the youth of the nation see a environment where leaders come and work...
^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ive mindset may conspire the employees. Instead these managers should work together in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17886178862 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19534835344 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452574525745 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 75.3829374435 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.578947368 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267483416596 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921363277229 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795202458787 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224501425749 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884947794013 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.