The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Leadership is one of the most valuable and intangible assets that one can bring to a corporation. The sense of cooperation being the fundamental undergird of leadership must be encouraged and propagated within the young people who are going to be the future of the world. My opinions incline with the statement that the best way really is, to prepare and broach the upcoming cohort of younger people about the importance of the sense of cooperation how it is fundamental, in leadership positions across the board, namely the government, industry, and other fields, The reasons why I opine as such are discussed below in the following three paragraphs.
Cooperation forms the basis or the glue that holds a team together. This sense of cooperation amongst all the members of the team requires the leader to bolster and maintain it. For example, a team rife with contentions have been seen to produce lesser results when hundred groups of workers working in the rice production industry in Georgia were studied. A heuristic approach by the study unravelled the fact that the groups of workers that had higher yields to their name, had leaders who regularly maintained a sense of harmony amongst the group members and made it a point to mitigate any discord that might have come up. This goes to show that cooperation among the members of a group, regularly underscored by the leader of the team, had a positive impact on the efficacy of their work and produce resulting to an overall benefit in terms of profit and relationships amongst the group. This helps us to understand another point that is discussed in the following paragraph.
Therefore, drawing from the previous reasoning, a sense of cooperation in a leader helps them listen to their team members and the issues that report regularly. As one of the most well-known apothegm goes "A good leader must be a good listener first", studies show for example, that leaders who regularly listen to, and address the concerns of their team have a better understanding about the performance of the team and how a certain issue might effect the efficacy of the team. Moreover, the team members report that they feel that their voices are being heard and necessary actions are being taken to alleviate the concerns they raise. This purportedly encourages them to travail and contribute more to the efforts of team.
Lastly, the sense of cooperation, is not only essential to glue a team together but also to expand as a part of industry or form meaningful partnerships with other industries. A corporation thrives on partnerships and it is essential for a leader to be cooperative while assessing the terms and conditions that they are offered in various collaborations. For example, the collaboration of the private sector companies like Google with Government sector organizations like NASA require strong leaders to establish collaborative ventures that will be beneficial to both the companies. A leader who is not cooperative might not be able to arrive at a settlement with the corporation that it wants to partner with, owing to reluctance in indulging in compromises at all. This would be deleterious to the company and also to the stake holder of the corporations, general public like us. This seals the importance of subsuming a sense of cooperation, so that the corporations as a whole can thrive on partnerships.
Though some people might argue, that competition helps people get inured to extreme pressure conditions and compete with other teams and corporations in the market, I would say, there will be no competition to participate into if the team doesn't have an efficacy high enough to contest. Rather we must focus primarily on cooperation that improves the team performance first. Thus, in sum the above three reasons buttress my opinion about why a sense of cooperation is key to nurturing leadership qualities among the younger generation of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...een seen to produce lesser results when hundred groups of workers working in the rice p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... the team and how a certain issue might effect the efficacy of the team. Moreover, the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 731, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...il and contribute more to the efforts of team. Lastly, the sense of cooperatio...
^^
Line 7, column 859, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...o the stake holder of the corporations, general public like us. This seals the importance of s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...etition to participate into if the team doesnt have an efficacy high enough to contest...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ave an efficacy high enough to contest. Rather we must focus primarily on cooperation ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 104.0 58.6224719101 177% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3295.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 651.0 442.535393258 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06144393241 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05120793913 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92326732784 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 306.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470046082949 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 1026.9 704.065955056 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.2166684956 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.772727273 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5909090909 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203562193181 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057014413826 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429822168929 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11533698978 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494424691548 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.