"It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves."
Identity is one of the cardinal aspects of any human being. Let it be any animal or even plants, most of the living flora and fauna and all life on this planet have an unique identification. Yet when we consider humans we tend to adhere to a different perspective, where an individual is identified based on his or her standings of the society. This might be one of the prime features of human derived from the fact that human beings are gregarious animals. But the claim that the primary identification of an individual is solely based on the social groups that they belong to might be a far-fetched statement. There are two conspicuos reasons that makes me think that and they are explaoned below.
Most of the times the social groups we belong to are not chosen by us but we are associated to them by virtue of birth. Humans unfortunately cannot chose the family they wish to be born into. The social group into which they are born into are imposed on them. For example a child who took birth in an orthodox hindu family in a small town in the country of India had no control over his gateway to the mortal world. As soon as he or she is out of the mother's womb, the apellations and the customs and social views that are associated with the group (their family belongs to) are now valid for him or her. The upbringing of the child among the social group shapes the child's incipient mortal mind. Thus the social group he or she will belong to by virtue of birth will always or to some extent will be imposed on them even if they evince iconoclasm towrds them as they grow up.
The social groups in which an individual is found to exist might not be a proper identification as it based mainly on generalization. By generalizing an individual based on the groups he mixes with or lives with leaves no chance for that individual's self expression and individuality to get considered for their identification. For instance it has been found in various psychological surveys that an individual's form of self expression in most cases and the how they express themselves when in their group have great disparity. It was also found that the individuals having similar characters and traits that aligned with the overall character of the social group they belonged to, still had some unique sides to their personalities which were noteable and strong forms of self expression unique to that individual. This shows that by generalization based on social groups we might fail to recognize the uniqueness an individual possess.
Identification based on social groups greatly undermines individuality and even digresses individuals from their path of self discovery and realization. When we identify someone based on their social group it is fairly possible, that the individuals might force themselves to express according to the social construct. That might not work for that individual. This can lead to problems for example situational depression. The person might suffer from delusions about what his character and form must look and behave like but it would not be possible for them to do so because their snubbed individuality is the only true form that they can express themselves through and needs to be discovered
In conclusion the above reasonings are the salient reasons why we should refrain from identifyinf individuals based on their social groups. We are trying to identify individuals and generalization as the first step is questionable thing to do isn't it? I would rather feel more empowered if some one acknowledges me to be the person who I am for how I articulate and present myself in honesty then being refered to as an individual belonging to a certain caste, religious or social background.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... fauna and all life on this planet have an unique identification. Yet when we cons...
^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mothers'' or 'mother's'?
Suggestion: mothers'; mother's
...rld. As soon as he or she is out of the mothers womb, the apellations and the customs a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 695, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hapes the childs incipient mortal mind. Thus the social group he or she will belong ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...rm of self expression in most cases and the how they express themselves when in their g...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... first step is questionable thing to do isnt it? I would rather feel more empowered ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...? I would rather feel more empowered if some one acknowledges me to be the person who I ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, still, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 78.0 33.0505617978 236% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3073.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 637.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82417582418 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02382911018 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83026761856 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445839874411 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 971.1 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.0673029766 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.92 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.48 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200299621434 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696861185183 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614580698415 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122620332297 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355364825724 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.