The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
Every field is constantly looking for ways to effectively live in order for the community to thrive. However, those communities oftem choose various methods of training its predecessors. I mostly align that young generation should be prepared for leadership by inputing a measure of cooperation instaed of acrimony for the sake of unity and independent growth. Nonetheless, many a community have embraced the opposite.
To start with, emerging young leaders should be taught soft leadeership skills that encourage cooperation rather than competition, because any community would thrive in that kind of environment. Team Spirit would be improved, and tasks would be completed on time and effectively. For instance, MOBIL INc, an international Oil ad Gas Company originated in Germany, undergoes a biannual leadership training for its employees. An interesting module of this training, which is Cooperation: the Effective Way to Growth, is an important requirement taking 12 hours. As a result, Performance rates in various departments has greatly improved over the course of 3 years. With cooperation, peace, calmnes, and an healthy work environment is encouraged.
Not only is learning cooperation is essential for productiveness, the knowledge also alienate any sort of acrimony amidst employees in any government. Humans have predilection for competitiveness. Hence, they strive to measure up to the strengths of other leaders, instead on focusing their own strengths and even weaknesses. This always breed a form of hate and thus, malfeasance, amidst young people. King George I in the Roman Empire always saw his twin Brother, who is a founder of a compamy., King David, as a threat. As a result of this success, their difference as since beginning irrecoverable.
However, in as much as cooperation should be learnt rather than competition, there are some societies, in which their competition are healthy. Haealthy competition is the interaction between individuals that promotes and fpsters sytriving for higher achievements . IN this kind of environment, like the one exemplified in the White House. Instead of wishing anyone falls, a leader uses another person success as a spur to even higher acheievements. Ways and factors that fosters a helathy kind of competition should be taught to emerging leaders in every sector in the society.
In conclusion, I mostly agree that cooperation should be encouraged amidst young leaders because of the efficiency, productivity, and growth it foster. At the same time, competition, albeit healthy, should constititue a major module by which leaders are taught and made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which is Cooperation: the Effective Way to Growth, is an important requirement t...
^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
.... With cooperation, peace, calmnes, and an healthy work environment is encouraged....
^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...psters sytriving for higher achievements . IN this kind of environment, like the o...
^^
Line 9, column 145, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fosters'?
Suggestion: fosters
...efficiency, productivity, and growth it foster. At the same time, competition, albeit ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5099009901 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2058949665 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5480236679 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7826086957 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5652173913 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190314625091 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487762958639 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509106201702 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106070631783 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421452281098 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.