“The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As the author suggests, if we impose a strict limit on the amount of trash from each household in towns and cities, we will be able to solve our environmental problem. The author has some valid point, by imposing a limit on the amount of trash will help, but this alone will not be sufficient to solve our environmental problems. To protect our ecosystem, we also need to take extra measures to solve our environmental problems.
With the increase in non-biodegradable wastes, we are facing many environmental problems. These non-biodegradable wastes have a penchant to ruin fertility of land. They make land inhabitant for farming. These non-biodegradable wastes degrades in thousands of years, producing many harmful gases and making land infertile. Strict steps should be taken to stop these non-biodegradable wastes in order to save our lands.
Moreover, People should separate their waste in organic and non-organic waste, and should use their organic waste in cultivating their garden or farming organic vegetables. In this way, they can limit their waste and can use waste products diligently. These waste can also be used for generating electricity through biogas. There are many ways in which we can use biodegradable waste for benefit of people. Also, we should be more meticulous while buying a product, encouraging people to buy biodegradable products, colloquial, we can produce less waste and help in solving our environmental problems.
Additionally, Industries are biggest contributor in environmental problems. Maximum deleterious, non-biodegradable, and non-renewable wastes are disposed from industries. Strict rules should be imposed on them. They should be encourages to use more renewable and biodegradable resources. There should be proper checkpoints in order to ensure that they are not harming our ecosystem through odious or deleterious wastes.
In sum, imposing a limit on the amount of trash from each household in towns and cities is not only a solution to the problem, we can also achieve it through sundry ways. We just need to make more sound and appropriate measures to handle our environmental problem. This can also be achieve by making people more vigilant towards biodegradable products while buying and by encouraging industries to use more renewable and biodegradable resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 26, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the biggest'.
Suggestion: are the biggest
...l problems. Additionally, Industries are biggest contributor in environmental problems. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 238, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...osed on them. They should be encourages to use more renewable and biodegradable resour...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44475138122 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27071006606 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46408839779 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9822996607 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8571428571 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61904761905 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201017314038 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744284503694 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701631811225 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121537826768 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580760545587 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.