"Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time.”
As a human being, we have a tendency to avoid truth because most of the time truth is appalling and it has a history attacking the accepted wisdom. Truth as it seems so simple but it has a deep and convoluted meaning hidden in it. Truth is never mollifying, it always causes a deep turmoil in an individual. As time passes, an individual unravels more about truth and it gets acerbic with time.
To illustrate let us look at an example, there are many famous theories on the existence of nasal lines. These are the lines which can only be seen from universe and it was made 2000 years ago. There is this one famous theory which claims that these lines was developed by aliens so that they can see these lines from universe and land there. As we go deep in these theories we will unravel bit by bit small truth about these line and which is outrageous and not comforting.
As a human being, we have a predilection to not hear acerbic truth, because it make us uncomfortable. We try to escape from the truth and when we confront them in future it is pretty obvious we will be outrageous.
In addition, important truth is not always outrageous and attacks upon the accepted wisdom. Sometime, they support the experience and make us feel good about the truth.
In conclusion, most of the time truth is caustic and unpleasant to hear, but it is important, for our development, to have better understanding of right conscience of right and wrong. Escaping from truth is inevitable and one should not avoid truth just for his comfort, no matter how much uncomfortable truth is one must accept it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...n to not hear acerbic truth, because it make us uncomfortable. We try to escape from...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60839160839 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59026491808 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524475524476 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2809731032 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.1428571429 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210744310575 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836350349774 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897333417849 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132562405296 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784099595103 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.