The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
While it is true that environment problems are caused by consumer-generated waste, but imposing strict limits on the accepted amount of trash disposed by each household is not the best way forward.
Firstly, amount of trash generated by each household is directly proportional to the number of residents living in it and hence a simple limitation on each household is not feasible and might lead to some other environmental issues like cleanliness and hygiene, because large families would not be able to fulfill those limits and might have to dump their garbage in some empty areas.
Secondly, even if the limitations are made keeping the amount of residents for each households in mind then those limitations would be rather complex and require a seperate government entity to monitor and regulate for each and every city in the country. This will cost a lot of government money, which is paid in taxes by the people. Instead this money should be invested in educating and spreading awareness among the people to use recycling, reusable bags to buy products from market.
Thirdly, one of the besy way forward to tackle environmental problems caused by garbage should be to restrict retailers and manufacturers of the industries to sell their products in plastic bags and replace them with eco friendly packaging. This will automatically result in more eco friendly and reusable garbage generation which is good for environment.
In conclusion, imposing strict limits on the amount of trash generated by each household will not solve the environmental problems but might create bigger hygienic problems and maybe turning away from plastic bags to eco friendly bags is the best way forward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
..., which is paid in taxes by the people. Instead this money should be invested in educat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sable bags to buy products from market. Thirdly, one of the besy way forward to ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... caused by garbage should be to restrict retailers and manufacturers of the indus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86675097576 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.4737531 60.3974514979 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.75 118.986275619 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.375 23.4991977007 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.125 5.21951772744 271% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454616858782 0.243740707755 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192137336276 0.0831039109588 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159387690508 0.0758088955206 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273254118571 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145944706276 0.0667264976115 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.