The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The given argument, instead of shedding light on a mammoth task, has given importance to a less significant fact. every day, in the newspaper, we find a myriad of descriptions relative to the Environmental hazards on people and things and how it is eating our earth and ruining the universe. The more complicated problems arise due to wastes from industry, e- wastes, plastics, household, etc. Consumer-generated waste accounts for only a nominal percentage in comparison to other wastes.
Therefore, to impose strict limits on the amount of trash that will be accepted from each household may not lead to fruitful results. If such a rule is laid down, then there are two possibilities of the effort taken to go wrong. Firstly, uneducated people may resort to other means of disposing their waste materials which in turn could lead to the accumulation rather than a reduction of trash. Since nowadays, public trash cans are set up in all places accessible to humans, there is a greater chance of them to get filled and overflooded every day. On the other hand, individuals might start thinking that they are doing a good job, unaware of the fact that household garbage constitutes a very minimal amount that can get accumulated over a period. Hence, they might not care about the other side of the issue like taking steps in order to avoiding littering and throwing of e-waste.
Furthermore, before any rules or regulations are laid down, it is always better to educate the public by giving information’s about the current scenario that the world is facing and how their negligence could lead to their own destruction. Also, government should take steps to lead the citizens by means of living an exemplary life using the leaders as perfect role models. For example, in india, Swacch Bharat campaign was initiated with the motive to make india a cleaner and greener nation. initially, there was a greater incidence of throwing papers and other things wherever they felt like doing it. The initiative was taken by the prime minister from his own capital city thereby gradually accomplishing the goal towards the other parts of the country. In every state, it was advised that, a person found negating such restrictions would be imposed with heavy fines and penalties. Recently, on could witness the reduction of littering in public places followed by construction of public toilets and effective usage of them. Women were educated on the proper use of napkins and heir safe disposal. This type of awareness has led to the country to be on the verge of becoming a developed nation according to the vision of our former president and scientist Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam.
Thus, to conclude, it could be reiterated that, instead of trying to put an end to minor issues, steps can be taken to sort out major problems, which could in turn lead to the betterment of all the people in the world directly and indirectly. Even though stringent actions on basic issues could be a turning point in each and ever one, it is better to stop the aggravation of a more serious issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Every
... importance to a less significant fact. every day, in the newspaper, we find a myriad...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 501, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Initially
...ake india a cleaner and greener nation. initially, there was a greater incidence of throw...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2563.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90057361377 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74771971344 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 215.323595506 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577437858509 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9381410622 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.047619048 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9047619048 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145578572104 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387837277846 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611754084553 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084938014334 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563338045054 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.