The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The topic raises the conventional issue to solve environmental problems caused by the consumer generated waste. The prompt states that to solve the problem the town should impose limit on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. Nevertheless, the household waste cannot be the main reason for the problems. The issue stated has few flaws that need to be addressed and discussed.
First of all, let us understand whether or not is consumer generated waste the only source of waste that is causing environmental problems. The problems can be caused by many more reasons, it can be due to the increase in number of vehicle on road which means more fossil fuel is been burnt, that is directly increases the amount of carbon in air causing more pollution, or it can be the continues deforestation, which reduced the number of trees to absorb the carbon and other harmful chemical. The amount of e-waste that is been generated can also cause several environmental problems.
Is imposing the limit of trash to be collected the right solution to the problem. Let's think in these way, if the town imposed a daily limit of only one trash bag to be collected daily with a weight limit of 250gm and on an average a household produces more than 1kg of trash daily, then in these scenario what should be done with the remaining 750 or more grams of waste that the house hold has? Should they just pile up the waste in there basement? Even if such law is imposed such a parameter should be taken into consideration while imposing such laws.
Moving ahead with the discussion, isn't the responsibility of the government authority of each town or city to have proper disposal setup, a recycling plant to handle such type of waste on daily bases. The amount of waste that is generated should be throughly processed, necessary materials like steel, plastic, other metals and recyclables should be seperated out to recycle them and make use products out of it.
In conclusion, I disagree with issue prompt due to the above reasons, the issue stated in the prompt, need to be revised to some extent and key points from the above discussion need to be taken into consideration. There are multiple ways in which environmental problems could be solved or reduced by some extent, or it's not just the consumer generated waste from household, but there are more than one reason.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The topic raises the conventional issue ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at need to be addressed and discussed. First of all, let us understand whether ...
^^^
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ed. First of all, let us understand whether or not is consumer generated waste the only so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cause several environmental problems. Is imposing the limit of trash to be col...
^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...cted the right solution to the problem. Lets think in these way, if the town imposed...
^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this way' or 'these ways'?
Suggestion: this way; these ways
... solution to the problem. Lets think in these way, if the town imposed a daily limit of o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this scenario' or 'these scenarios'?
Suggestion: this scenario; these scenarios
...s more than 1kg of trash daily, then in these scenario what should be done with the remaining ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...st pile up the waste in there basement? Even if such law is imposed such a parameter sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsideration while imposing such laws. Moving ahead with the discussion, isnt t...
^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
.... Moving ahead with the discussion, isnt the responsibility of the government au...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them and make use products out of it. In conclusion, I disagree with issue pro...
^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t just the consumer generated waste from household, but there are more than one r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, then, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78536585366 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63444442758 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485365853659 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.0774878421 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.8 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320315822425 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125812332997 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972797277184 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1848693449 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800226745249 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.