The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
The recommendation presents a view that I would agree with the statement "The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones" in most of the cases but, there are some instances I would disagree with it.
Being an educator, I completely agree with the point, that some instances should be ignored by a teacher while, at some point a teacher should highlight the actions. The difference in the actions required to be taken can be very well understood from the presented cases. The teacher helps the student in becoming not only literate but also educated which includes having high moral values, being alturistic and most importantly well mannered. The teacher should always appreciate the small positive gestures of their students, for example, raising hand before speaking, seeking permission before using someone's things. Students feels elated when they are appreciated in front of others and they try to improve themselves by indulging in such activities again and again. The teacher appreciating a student on such occasssions can ignore the ones who are not doing the same. These are the cases which does not harm any other students and have meagre value at that point of time. Such habits can be learned with the time. Developing a sense of selecting morally correct actions and appreciating them is matter of paramount importance.
Perhaps, the major concerns lies when the actions of the students are intended to harm the other students. It is necessary to impede such actions. A teacher should not ignore the cases where a student tries to indulge in a fight with the others or tries to bully them. Such actions create a huge impact on student's moral and personality framework. Ignoring such actiivites in the name of childhood can lead to the development of the destructive and morally unacceptable ideology among the students. A teacher should always counsel their students about not indulging in such activities and present them the reasons why they shouldn't. Ignoring such activities is similar to giving a hands up to their students.
A deep care and meticulous understanding of an individual case and acting suitably is the prime duty of a teacher. A teacher should be able to distinguish the cases where to raise an issue and where not to. The teacher should also develop a sense what appropriate actions should be taken, as some cases require serious actions while other may require a mere scolding. Such things vary student to student and according to the depth of the matter. This can be interpreted through following case: A student always known for its ebullient, diligent and sangfroid nature, indulges in some malpractices, a teacher initially should not take serious actions and should properly counsel and understand the reason for such indulgences but regular indulgence is a problematic issue which requires serious actions.
So, the presented cases gives an overview where the recommendation agrees with the statement and where it doesn't. Such cases has helped me develop my view on the presented statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tic and most importantly well mannered. The teacher should always appreciate the sm...
^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...m. Such actions create a huge impact on students moral and personality framework. Ignori...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...s and present them the reasons why they shouldnt. Ignoring such activities is similar to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a hand' or simply 'hands'?
Suggestion: a hand; hands
...ng such activities is similar to giving a hands up to their students. A deep care a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 748, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such indulgences but regular indulgence is a problematic issue which requires s...
^^
Line 7, column 787, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is a problematic issue which requires serious actions. So, the presented ...
^^
Line 7, column 806, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... issue which requires serious actions. So, the presented cases gives an overvie...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... agrees with the statement and where it doesnt. Such cases has helped me develop my vi...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...atement and where it doesnt. Such cases has helped me develop my view on the presen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13944223108 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72884519271 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486055776892 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7860589757 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150072568375 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042862417867 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789093113415 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115930798776 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14106297067 0.0667264976115 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.