The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
I partially agree with the statement, it is a human mentality to lean towards the things where our skills are getting appreciated, our knowledge is getting flourished or our someone is providing a platform to enhance our positive traits. Also when our actions are being marked or promoted we feel encouraged and take more efforts to do the same for the next time.
In schools, when teacher appreciates students actions, the students feels that he/she is being supported and later the students takes more efforts in their work to show cast their abilities. Also at home when you cook something and your parents appreciates it, you instantly feel encouraged and that naturally builds our liking to make it happen again. So this is not constrained only to younger age group but it's also seen in all age groups.
Despite praising positive actions lead to good outcome, neglecting negative actions can also lead to bad consequences. When a primary school teacher appreciates student who shares his stationery with his fellow classmates, this can teach the student that he is doing the right thing and so do others should also follow his action. But when the same students creates noise while the teacher is teaching and if the teacher doesn’t let him know or ignores it, it can lead to inappropriate behaviour. Unless the teacher lets him know about it he will think that his actions are quite fine and his behaviour could lead to something else or he might repeat it. To improve the students behavior punishing or scolding is not a wise act to do.
In summary, positive reinforcement is certainly an excellent method of teaching new methods or behaviors and encouraging student to learn more. However, to ignore rather than recognize and correct negative actions, would be a disservice to the student, for he would not know what conclusion to draw from his action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...latform to enhance our positive traits. Also when our actions are being marked or pr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...heir work to show cast their abilities. Also at home when you cook something and you...
^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'classmates'.
Suggestion: classmates
...dent who shares his stationery with his fellow classmates, this can teach the student that he is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 676, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e or he might repeat it. To improve the students behavior punishing or scolding is not a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97142857143 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66826482723 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8555552115 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14544789568 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572041794108 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670882450696 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877361033852 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067424731827 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.