The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
The assertion claims that the best way of teaching would be to praise the positive actions and to ignore the negative actions. However, I would not completely agree with the claim as there are many cases where the above mentioned assertion would not work.
Firstly, ignoring the negative actions may lead to some serious damage to the teaching method being applied to a prodigy. For instance, in school when a young learner comes to the classroom, he or she hardly has any idea about the rules and regulations of the school. The faculty and the stuffs of the school must teach the prodigy how to become an avid learner by not only praising the positive actions he is taking but also by making logical criticism towards his negative behavior so that he might learn the adverse affects of acting negative and thus become conscious of his actions.
Secondly, when the scenario of worldwide politics is considered, it is seen that a ubiquitous practice of criticism is held from home and abroad. A myriad of critics pass their opinion against the government and authority for being on charge to take the major decisions. Unless the practice of criticism is not held properly, the political scenario of that particular era is highly questioned that there might be an issue of oppression for what the critics cannot make any statement. This is a classic example of the necessity of criticism against the negative actions to teach the authority how to lead a government.
Finally, in science and technology, when a theory is explained by a scientist, it is highly reviewed and suggested to improve it’s approach before considering the theory a valid one. This suggests that to bring out the best from even the most talented and persistent candidate, it is highly necessary to make logical criticism.
In conclusion, it would be absolutely unfair for a teacher to ignore the negative actions made by the learner for the purpose of teaching in the best possible way. The learner should not only be appreciated for his positive response but also should be given penalty for his negative actions to ensure the approach of the methodology of teaching as a fair one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion against the government and authority for being on charge to take the major de...
^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested improving'.
Suggestion: suggested improving
... a scientist, it is highly reviewed and suggested to improve it's approach before considering t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91280653951 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64780044773 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493188010899 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6261797293 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.692307692 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356024036518 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133154636815 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167233152184 0.0758088955206 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19159998243 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11522117475 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.