The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The author the statement stated that we should praise the positive actions and ignore the negative actions as this is the best way to teach someone. Many of us will argue that this will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same
We as a citizen of our own respective countries must ensure that our children must get right teaching, teaching that would help them in becoming a good citizen and help the nation in its progression. However the way of teaching might be different from person to person, school to school or from country to country, but our main motive should be is to teach our children, students in the best and productive way. One way of teaching as recommended by the author is that we should praise the positive action and ignore the negative action. As we know every coin has two sides the recommendation too, so let discuss the pros and cons of this.
First, the positive side of the suggestion is that if praise the positive side, this could encourage the children to do more positive things, as they are getting praise or even reward for doing this and if we ignore the negative one this will make him understand that he did something wrong and because of which he is not being rewarded. But the issue with this is that to make our child doing something good or praiseworthy, we have to give a bribe in the form of sweets or praising or by any other way and this could make him greedy because whenever he does the positive thing he needs something in return and this is not good at all.
Second, it will be difficult for a child to differentiate what is good or what is bad, here the feedback from their parents and teachers plays an important role. If their parents and teachers praise their actions they know that their actions are positive and they do not pay attention to other key factors like their situations, circumstances, and times. While their parents should explain why their actions were positive and should convince them by rendering strong examples of the positive consequence of their children's actions.
Last but not the least, if we ignore the negative action in the name of the best teaching way, then it could lead to hazardous consequences in the future. At an early age if won't stop our children or teachers won't stop their student then they may develop the habit as we know it difficult to be a responsible person instead of irresponsible. Ignoring their negative activities is like motivating them because they know if they do something wrong, they will get only ignorance not the punishment or other source of treatment.
In sum, ignoring negative one and praising positive action may be a good way of teaching but cannot firmly says that it would be the best one. As mentioned above, it would be better if we teach children about the consequences of their negative actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...and help the nation in its progression. However the way of teaching might be different ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6641074856 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50527863261 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42226487524 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9139025154 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.875 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5625 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419694450201 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190337479078 0.0831039109588 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.21613940139 0.0758088955206 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254402003089 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115139231047 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.