Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts
The statement argues that some people believe, that to ensure arts can flourish the government should provide funding to it, while others counter this by saying that this will threatens the integrity of the arts. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning to it.
The subject of government funding of the arts is a debatable issue and highly sensitive to the specifics of the country in mind, for example, in a country like Pakistan, where the economic condition is so bad that they have to take a loan of $6 billion dollars from IMF and if they start providing funds to the arts instead on focus on infrastructure, education and economy then they will fail as a nation and leads to the more crisis.
However, if a country is very rich in their art and culture might greatly benefit from the government’s investment in art so as to generate revenue from tourism, for example, Italy, which has a rich heritage and receive a huge number of tourisms because of this. So, they should provide funds to their heritage and art department or organization, so that they can improve the tourist experience.
Last but not the least, even the less developed can also fund to arts, as they could be beneficial from this, for example, India, which has one of the oldest cultures in the world, but the government is not focusing on it obviously there are several others issue with the country and because of this their cultural and art condition is not well such river Ganga which is considered to be as Goddess Ganga is very polluted. So, if they start funding for their arts, this will contributes to an overall positive tourism experience.
In a nutshell, we can say that whether to fund arts or not vary from country to country. If a country is in developed or a country can be hugely benefited by funding art, then they should definitely provide funds. But as mentioned if a countries economic condition is not good then they should avoid funding and focus to revive their economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'threaten'
Suggestion: threaten
...s counter this by saying that this will threatens the integrity of the arts. In my essay,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... so bad that they have to take a loan of billion dollars from IMF and if they sta...
^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...from the government’s investment in art so as to generate revenue from tourism, for exam...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tage and art department or organization, so that they can improve the tourist exp...
^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey can improve the tourist experience. Last but not the least, even the less de...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 476, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'contribute'
Suggestion: contribute
...start funding for their arts, this will contributes to an overall positive tourism experien...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a country' or simply 'countries'?
Suggestion: a country; countries
...tely provide funds. But as mentioned if a countries economic condition is not good then the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71348314607 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57630060993 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477528089888 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.351115797 60.3974514979 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.8 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6 23.4991977007 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30823690645 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145808797239 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100062575571 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192153493892 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362131350264 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.