Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
The statement argues that scandals are the most effective way to grab attention to the problem. Many of us will argue that this will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the argument and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
There are several ways that will help to focus on the problems and scandal is one of them, which often bring out the truth of events which have been occurring from last few months or year or even decades. They would help the people or the Government in finding the flaws in the system and act on it accordingly, for example, in India government finds the flaws in the banking after the scandals of business tycoon Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya, and as in the response, the government made changes in their banking laws. So, scandals can be very useful to address the problem.
However, scandals can be used in a negative way or for the personal benefits and this could have led to the serious repercussion on others, for example, many TV and films actors use scandals in order to gain publicity and sometimes used to destroy the image of Superstar or co-actor or actress. So, we should be very careful while a scandal came out in public and one should not use this a weapon against someone for revenge purposes or just to gain some fame.
Last but not the least, sometimes scandals present the vague scenario of the problem and this way more harmful for both the society and the person itself, for example, in 2016 the USA presidential election, Donald Trump was accused of the illegal collaboration with the Russian government to win the presidential election but when the investigation completed, he was found not guilty. This would definitely affect his image and the people of the USA and in this nobody was sure and there is no powerful evidence against him.
In nutshell, as mentioned above scandals can be a very important factor in not only addressing the problem but also in finding out the solution to the problem. But as we know every coin has two faces so as scandal too, it can also be used to harm the image of others for some personal benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...oblem. However, scandals can be used in a negative way or for the personal benefits and this c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun TV seems to be countable; consider using: 'many TVs'.
Suggestion: many TVs
...us repercussion on others, for example, many TV and films actors use scandals in order ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nge purposes or just to gain some fame. Last but not the least, sometimes scanda...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y and the person itself, for example, in 2016 the USA presidential election, Dona...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61038961039 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41324282541 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.6417417001 60.3974514979 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.916666667 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0833333333 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207305188958 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853339068993 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664356149253 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109839286085 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340726924009 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.