the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
As children, we tend to flirt around the line separating the so called good and wrong doings. Our essence as human is somehow imbued with this intangible proclivity of ascertaining the limits we can or shouldn't cross. Few disparate mavericks would, since childhood, be able to recognise whether a demeanour is negative. Therefore, it is essential for parents to provide children with a holistic picture of life and its vicissitudes, contingently upon their ages and the situations. Praising positive actions is the cornerstone of education, but ignoring the negative ones would amount to leniency and lack of boundaries, both essential for anyone to blissfully burgeon as individual.
Certain consequences potentially harmful of our mischiefs might extend beyond the familial nest's. How could one expect from an adult to properly behave within the society if he hadn't been told as a child that rules existed ? Such irresponsibility would result in crimes, incivilities, and we would be living with people whom would abide by nothing but their thinkings. On the other hand, people growing out absolved of admonishment or haranguing, might feed a glut of self-confidence. Not only would they be lacking of perspective when taking a decision, but such a world's picturisation is blinding and erroneous, in both personal and professional areas.
Only if a person is conveyed the consciousness of his own shortcomings and wrongdoings, will he fathom the conundrum of the good and bad. Constructive criticism help both children and adults to carve out as human beings, and determine the nature of one's beliefs, struggles but also achievements. However, praising positive actions, the impact of which is steadily stimulating, outweigh the light's throwing on negative ones, considered hackneyed when persistently highlighted.
Pointing out under-achievements and misconducts might also have detrimental effects to children at school, at home, and to grown people in the work area. It is essential to underscore that blooding thoughts hamper people's growth, whom, shouldn't be throttled by incessant negativity and chastisements. I strongly believe that even the little achievements or generic actions should be celebrated by parents, teachers, supervisors, and even friends. The ramifications of these colourful behaviours are sprawling, for it encourage people to push their limits and overwhelm them with positive feelings.
A balance, according to the person's traits, between the praise of positive actions and the awareness of negative ones, is thus the only solution to pave the way for a guileless future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ty of ascertaining the limits we can or shouldnt cross. Few disparate mavericks would, s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...roperly behave within the society if he hadnt been told as a child that rules existed...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a world' or simply 'worlds'?
Suggestion: a world; worlds
...ective when taking a decision, but such a worlds picturisation is blinding and erroneous...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...man beings, and determine the nature of ones beliefs, struggles but also achievement...
^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...g thoughts hamper peoples growth, whom, shouldnt be throttled by incessant negativity an...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51620947631 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21452715374 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620947630923 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4259900239 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185713753265 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498672163385 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857616022759 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113992704818 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762512927378 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.