Learning is one of the most essential aspects of our aspect. We learn throughout our lives which further helps us to grow in our life. Now while we are learning it’s important for us to understand what mistakes we are doing. We are always not capable to understand ourselves the difference between right and wrong actions. So we need guidance in order to perceive this difference. The complexity of this issue cannot be ignored. Stating that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones is an oversimplification of the issue. One needs to warily examine all the aspects before coming to a conclusion.
When children are young they are not aware about right and wrong. They may make mistakes like eating things which have fallen on ground, being mean to kids who are disabled, stealing, not sharing, throwing tantrums and so on. If their guardian ignores these mistakes these young innocent kids will never understand that what they were doing is wrong and will harm them in long run. Hence, by pointing out their mistakes at right time, their guardians can help them to understand that their actions are undesirable.
Similarly, in organizations young professionals display different kinds of behaviour. Few professionals do not report to office on time and few people flout the rules of the organization by not wearing appropriate clothes. Thus, in this case if such mistakes are ignored they will never bother to improve their behaviour. By pointing their mistakes and making them understand that such behaviour is unacceptable one can ensure that such behaviour is not getting repeated.
One cannot deny the fact that praising positive actions helps in reinforcing the correct actions. For example, if our kids show empathy towards underprivileged people and try to do something good for them, by appreciating their behaviour we are making them understand that their actions are good. Also, sometimes we need to ignore negative actions in order to ensure that it does not impact them negatively. For example, parents ignore many mistakes of teenagers are they know that its not correct to always scrutinize their kids. However, one needs to understand that there is an extent upto which such negative actions can be ignored and after one point such actions needs to be pin pointed in order to correct behaviour.
Hence, one can conclude that one needs to praise positive actions and point out wrong actions in order to reinforce correct behaviour. One must try to understand the situation and after looking into all the parameters decide the intensity of action which needs to be taken to correct the wrong actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'kid'.
Suggestion: kid
...ch have fallen on ground, being mean to kids who are disabled, stealing, not sharing...
^^^^
Line 4, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agers are they know that its not correct to always scrutinize their kids. However...
^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n which needs to be taken to correct the wrong actions.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68229579722 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465909090909 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1670994048 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6086956522 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1304347826 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30434782609 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190965379441 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641652044266 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128255608317 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107595739876 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688978895187 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.