The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
One has to learn while growing up, failing which, they would continue to repeat the same mistake and untimately lead the path of being unsuccessful in all their endevours. Hence, it can be agreeed that one should learn, but more importantly, learn at a fast pace. Therfore it can be argued that, best way to teach is to praise positive actions and additionally scold for the negative ones.
Often, it is the case that the person displaying negative habits is not aware. So, ignoring the negative actions would be the worst thing in the situation. Neither would he/she ever learn that they were doing something wrong but worse, they would continue exihibiting those behaviours in the future. Therefore, it becomes the responsibility for us, whether us refers to - friends, teachers, parents, collegues etc to bring the folly of others into their attention, so that they could take steps to become better.
Furthermore, as we all can agree that prasing actions is a good teaching method but, combining it will reprimanding can speed up the learning process. These two methods in conjunctions can even help to build two great habbits at once. For example, a kid is praised for doing homework and is awarded chocolate, this in turn reinforces the child to finish homework earlier. But on the other hand, the child might just rush through the homework in order to get the reward. Therefore, if the child is scolded for not doing the homework properply, this helps to inculcate two great habbits at the same time, that being - doing homework and also focusing on the current task. Hence, it can be said that we should address negative actions rather than ignoring them.
Additionally, there is a saying - "Pain is the best teacher". This satement is true and the validity can be traced to everyone who is successful. For instance, Gandhi could only sympathize with the outcasts and the mistreated individuals after he was thrown out of the train and learned - how an outcast feals? Taking another example, a kid riding a bicycle. The kid would never learn how to ride until unless he fall down and experiences the pain. It is only after experiencing the pain that the kid learns how to balance so that he could avoid further injuries. This being said, pain does not necessariley mean physical pain, in no way should the parents indulge in physically harming the child. Instead, the should let the kids acknowledge that their actions were incorrect by verbal communication.
To sum up, it can be agreed that praising positive actions is a good way to teach, but it can be agrued that addressing negative actions, rather than ignoring them can accelerate the teaching process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...ast pace. Therfore it can be argued that, best way to teach is to praise positive acti...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'learns'.
Suggestion: learns
...he situation. Neither would he/she ever learn that they were doing something wrong bu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reprimand'
Suggestion: reprimand
... teaching method but, combining it will reprimanding can speed up the learning process. Thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'falls'.
Suggestion: falls
...never learn how to ride until unless he fall down and experiences the pain. It is on...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94469026549 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6617992498 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546460176991 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4079078925 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.590909091 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231564391661 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698537749307 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12585915607 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152282209078 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102168467075 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.