Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
With the increase in population, man is appropriating the forest at an alarming rate. Huge wilderness areas are cleared and destroyed for the purpose of - construction, procuring natural resources and agriculture. Is there a requirement of stringent law to be passed by every nation to preserve remaining forests? The answer to this question hinges on the status of a nation's economy. For a country with an unstable and poor economy, it is not advisable, but for a developed nation with well to do economy, laws should be passed to stop the destruction of wilderness areas.
Firstly, let us take the case of poor nations. In such countries, laws restricting access to resources for economic gain can have a detrimental effect on the economy. The primary goal of the nation is to look after its citizens, so in this case, the forest area should be used for boosting the economy by utilizing the natural resources and clearing the lands for agriculture.
Secondly, for developed nations, strict laws should be passed for the protection of the forest. We are already witnessing the effects of global warming and the destruction of forests acts as a catalyst in preponing a catastrophic event. Because in absence of such laws, greedy businesses will eradicate forests without hesitation even though it can be for small economic gain. We fail to understand the work done by the forest to clear the air and in maintaining water cycles. It would take trillions of dollars to develop a similar machine with purifies air and that it just one of the many roles played by forests. The benefits of preserving the forest outweigh that of the small economic gains caused by their eradication.
Furthermore, it is possible to preserve and get economic benefits from the forests at the same time. Tourism provides a great solution where the country can benefit from keeping the forest in pristine condition and earn from the tourists who can come to appreciate the nature.
To sum up, we cannot propose a golden rule that applies to everyone, hence countries will well to do economy should pass stringent laws to protect the most priceless resource - wilderness areas. But for countries with no so well to do economies, they should use the forest to improve the condition of a country and alleviate the living conditions of its citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...this question hinges on the status of a nations economy. For a country with an unstable...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97948717949 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8044475521 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8970456555 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256394392123 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866384253603 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795567157437 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142898955168 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799370530525 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.