Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position

A nation always strives to develop in economic, social and cultural aspects and to enforce the same, a myriad number of laws have been passed. Does the nation's growth rest on these factors only? A nation's environmental wealth is of paramount importance too. To elaborate on the term environmental wealth, it includes forests, national parks and sanctuaries which are the habitats for the wild animals.

Firstly, passing laws in to preserve any reamining wilderness areas in their natural state is superior to the idea of gaining economic benefits by destroying these wilderness areas. Forests and national parks are home to millions of diverse species, enriching the wildlife of a nation. Encroaching in these natural habitats directly leads to putting these wild animals at a risk of extinction. For example, the Dodo, a bird is completely extinct due to hunting and poaching of their habitats. Also, tigers are on a verge of extinction and probably, in a few years, they will become an extinct species too. Hence, passing laws is important to preserve these habitats which implicitly helps the endangered species.

Secondly, if the habitats are protexted, this can save the species in those habitats. For instance, how would man feel if someone steps into his house and takes away everything needed for his survival ? Likewise, animals are being deprived of their own environment due to man's greedy needs to gain profit by dominating over wilderness areas.

Thirdly, commercialization has a huge role in being one of the reasons for destruction of forest areas. The nation must pass stringent laws and must enforce regulations where people who illegally construct buildings or make commerical use of the forest areas will be punished. Once such laws will be passed, there is a possibility that the goal to preserve a country's environmental wealth is can be achieved.

Finally, people might say that the forest land could be a good use for the economic development of a country and the fauna residing in these areas can be shifted to a zoo. This is not a viable option because the natural behavior of the animals is altered due to the caged environment they live in. Living in an enclosed area will definitely make the animals lose their natural instincts like hunting. Hence, no matter how beneficial a wilderness area can seem from the view of profits, preservation in the natural state is of primary importance.

Thus in conclusion, the government should pass laws and regulations which requires adheration to not violating these wilderness areas and once this is achieved, a nation is said to be rich in wildlife and it's environmental wealth increases.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...mber of laws have been passed. Does the nations growth rest on these factors only? A na...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: A nation; Nations
...ions growth rest on these factors only? A nations environmental wealth is of paramount im...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people who illegally construct buildings or make commerical use of the forest are...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ural state is of primary importance. Thus in conclusion, the government should pa...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11441647597 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84515652656 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530892448513 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4975342819 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8095238095 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364164094823 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970914197916 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725679280386 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178960285605 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589730539841 0.0667264976115 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.