Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Monitoring of employee emails is unethical and instead of saving the time of employees and protecting against lawsuits, monitoring will do the contrary.
Firstly, monitoring of someones emails, even when it is your employees, is an intrusion of privacy. There are laws in the constitution which protect the right to privacy. In the past few years there have been so many fights related to privacy, resulting in the waste of both time and money. The biggest one is the Edward Snowden case - former NSA employee, he exposed how the US government is using technology to spy on everyone one of its citizens and also others around the world. After this news, right to privacy has become even more serious matter. Hence, if the company decides to infringe upon the privacy of its employees by monitoring their mail, there will be more lawsuits than the ones it was trying to prevent. One way to solve this problem can be via educational courses that teach employees how to save time and best practices to follow while writing or responding to mails.
Secondly, studies have shown that the productivity decreases when the person feels that he is being monitored, which is in stark contrast to what company wants. If the company starts monitoring the mails, the employees will waste unneccesary time on composing even the most rudimentary mails. To tackle this, the company can save the resources that it would have other wise used for monitoring, and instead redirect it towards the induction program for new joinee and refreshers course held yearly for others, which would educate them about how to be prudent about valuable resources like time and system capacity. Furthermore, the company can reward employees, who have been the most productive and used the resources judiciously.
Lastly, let us assume the company started monitoring the resources. The overhead cost of time and money utilized by the management would be more than the infrequent damage endured by the company in lawsuits. furthermore, if proponent of this proposal posits that the routine monitoring would incur less cost if it is weekly or even monthly. But saying this defects the purpose of monitoring, it is possible that in the frequent monitory over big intervals may skip the damaging emails. Therefore, its is not wise to monitor the emails and rather use the money saved to educate employees.
To sum up, monitoring of employee emails is harmful and the potential of any benefit is scant. Therefore, if the company want to increase the productivity of employees, it should redirect its focus on educating the people via seminars and encouraging them by awarding the most productive employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 833, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practices following'.
Suggestion: practices following
...ach employees how to save time and best practices to follow while writing or responding to mails. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: OTHER_WISE_OTHERWISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'otherwise'?
Suggestion: otherwise
...n save the resources that it would have other wise used for monitoring, and instead redire...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...age endured by the company in lawsuits. furthermore, if proponent of this proposal posits t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06802721088 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67247438266 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526077097506 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5028362543 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.631578947 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279336733925 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866973140325 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718286537996 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171818820148 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579878716163 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.