The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Many erudite scholars and pundits since the beginning of time has proposed and argued on the different approaches to teach students, children or even anybody in the position to learn. And in this terms, should the best approach in teaching be to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones, or otherwise? In my view, I actually do not support this ppositon, as I believe that the best way to teach is while we praise the positive actions, we should also consider too reproach or censure the negative ones. This is becauuse of the following reasons.
Consider the thief who stole the mona lisa portrait of da vinci in France, claiming that the portrait should be in Italy and not in France since it originated or perhaps the artist is from Italy. While stealing is a reproachable act, some praised the thief for his patriotism to his country while ignoring the fact that he stole. Now imagine stating this fact to a child, praising his/ her positive actions and ignoring the negative ones? What do you think would be the outcome? Such a child would in one way or the other try to express any of his/her negative actions in a positive way.
This can also be seen at the illustration of Ojukwu of Eastern Nigeria, who in an aim to librate the Eastern Nigerians ended up in a brutal war lasting for 3 years which caused the death of millions of young and old. And in the end, ran away to cameroon after he saw he had losed just to escape punishment for war crimes. Humorously, children in the east of Nigeria are thought to symbolize Ojokwu for his audaciousness and bravery to fight. However, ignoring the lose of lives and the negative impacts. Looking critically, eastern Nigeria has the highest rate of theft and scam in the country. This I so much believe sprouted from aadherin g to priasing the positive and ignoring the negative.
Conclusively, I strongly believe that while its good to praise the positive actions, the best way to teach is to also consider reproaching the negative ones, and not ignore it. As this can be seen from that of the thief of Mona lisa painting and Ojukwu of Eastern Nigeria.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nybody in the position to learn. And in this terms, should the best approach in teac...
^^^^
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to reproach'?
Suggestion: to reproach
...sitive actions, we should also consider too reproach or censure the negative ones. This is b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...express any of his/her negative actions in a positive way. This can also be seen at the illustra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 460, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...and bravery to fight. However, ignoring the lose of lives and the negative impacts. Look...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 578, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a has the highest rate of theft and scam in the country. This I so much believe s...
^^
Line 4, column 611, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...nd scam in the country. This I so much believe sprouted from aadherin g to priasing th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, look, so, while, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64893617021 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51081296724 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507978723404 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5671098508 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.823529412 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1176470588 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236199192022 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759850520428 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674217979952 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141876891895 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398390264096 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.