Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
For the past few centuries, scientific researches and its development have made great improvement to our lives. From riding horses to travelling on luxurious cars, from hoes and cutlasses to tractors, even in the health sector, diseases that were ones seen as uncurable can be cured now with just som tablets. This is how far scientific researches has aided us in our daily lives. However, there is a great call for researches to be monitored to avoid umprecendented and ill causing effects. We have seen from history how researches can be deleterious to the society if not well monitored, that of the nuclear plant explosion in Russia and other few countries corroborates such. Thus in muy opinion, I strongly believe that government should place restrictions, if any, but few on scientific researches and development so as to provide safety to the people and the scientists themselves.
Though some may argue that placing restrictions hamstrungs some valuable researches, as nothing good comes without its adverse effects. Such people may point to the research on nuclear bomb which when dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ended the brutal world war II which lasted for 6 years war and 1 day. However taking a closer look at this, if such research continues without restrictions, definitely this world have been history a long time ago. As different countries would have experimented on it themselves and even private bodies would have used it too. We would most likely have gone tp find resort in the moon or jupiter, that i sif they have not been blown up too.
On the contrary, consider the Nuclear act which placed restrictions on scientific researches and development on Nuclear materials. This way, the goverment of different countries have been able to control and supervise the use and researches on them to help preserve our communityy, our continent and most importantly our world.
Also consider the restrictions placed on researches which alter genetics and transmutations, if scientists had continued suuch research it would have been disasterous as humans genetics would have been altered. Such research have to be put on check to help sasve ourselves from the distruction of ourselves and our future.
Conclusively, I strongly opine that placing restrictions on scientific researches and development by the government is very important, as this would have preserve and save our continent, our people and our future generations. As this can be seen from researches conducted on NUclear weapons and genetic transmutation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
For the past few centuries, scientific researches and...
^^
Line 1, column 553, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istory how researches can be deleterious to the society if not well monitored, th...
^^
Line 1, column 682, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... other few countries corroborates such. Thus in muy opinion, I strongly believe that...
^^^^
Line 1, column 822, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...n scientific researches and development so as to provide safety to the people and the sc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'considers'.
Suggestion: considers
...t and most importantly our world. Also consider the restrictions placed on researches w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'preserved'.
Suggestion: preserved
...t is very important, as this would have preserve and save our continent, our people and ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21271393643 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99948684743 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520782396088 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3958445819 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.411764706 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0588235294 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173375735952 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669672706036 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617274520361 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109568927129 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029722957071 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.