The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The introduction of modern computers after the second world war has goes through an exponential growth. It has morphed from been as big a room to becoming mobile and even as small as a chip. This introduction of computers has led to the birth of different machines that can be used to supplant jobs or activities humans find tenious. However, there has been concerns about the use of this machines, will the human mind which led to the creation of these sophisticated tools always be superior to the machinies because they are only tools of the human mind, or will the machines grow to a point where they hereby rule us and become superior to our mind. To this, I strongly support that the human mind will always be superior to machines because they are only tools of human minds. This is because machines are only given a set instructions called programs, that are a combination of mathematical algorithms, and so they lack the ability to think.
Those who refutes this may point to the advent of machine learning and artificial intelligence, where machines have been taught to learn data's of which they can make future predicions. They may point to the alphago machine, which succeeded in defeating the world best player as an illustration that the human mind will not always be superior to machines. However, they seem to have forgotten that while the alphago machine may have programmed to be very good at the go game, it would not recognize a fly if it passes over. It is only a set of algorithms which cannot do more than it is programmed. However, the human mind is a very intricate and convoluted machine, which can recognize, perform myriads of tasks, and able to denote subtle differences. Thus, superior to machines.
Also, the ability of the human mind to think will always make it superior to machines. This is one thing machines will always lack, as they may be good at the whatever they are programmed to do. But whenever there is a subtle change it flags an error, waiting the the smart human mind to come to the rescue. Whereas, when there is a change or something different, the human mind thinks of a way ro circumvent through this process and logical, pithy or cogent solutions to the change. This way the ability to think of the human mind,which machines lack, will always make it superior to machines, as they are rather only a tool of the human mind itself.
In conclusion, though there might be debates as to the machines becoming superior than the human mind due to its ability to continuously perform tasks without lethargy, unlike the humans and it ability to swiftly perform complex mathematical computations. However, I strongly believe that the human mind will always be superior to machines since it is a mere tool of the human mind created to aid humans for perfunctory tasks. And so, the mind to have more time to solve many more intricate problems facing the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...here has been concerns about the use of this machines, will the human mind which led...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ubtle change it flags an error, waiting the the smart human mind to come to the rescue....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ubtle change it flags an error, waiting the the smart human mind to come to the rescue....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (ro) must be used with a third-person verb: 'circumvents'.
Suggestion: circumvents
...rent, the human mind thinks of a way ro circumvent through this process and logical, pithy...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...y the ability to think of the human mind,which machines lack, will always make it supe...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...es as to the machines becoming superior than the human mind due to its ability to co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, thus, whereas, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71456692913 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5984990147 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425196850394 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4974605791 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372316984501 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138979063453 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113122049645 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270832700241 0.150359130593 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372380415203 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.