The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
I partially agree with the statement that "the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones"/ Children should be awarded for positive behaviors but turning a blind eye on all negative ones can be destructive.
Rewarding children boosts the motivation of them to study harder and elicit proper behaviors in the class. Take a student who raises his hand to answer the question of a teacher in the class as an example. A word of compliment not only encourage the particular student but also the whole class to molten their shyness and participate in the class discussion. On the other hand, praising students increase self-confidence among them. Accordingly, it has a long-term effect on their life.
Conversely, showing inappropriate behaviors could be disruptive and overlooking them encourages the offender to repeat it in the class. Furthermore, it disrupts remaining students to concentrate on the subject being taught by the teacher. Admittedly, having words with the student privately, and in a severe situation punishing him orally is recommended. It should be stressed that a group of mistakes needs this kind of reaction. Sometimes ignoring student in the class is sufficient. For example, a polite student has a small talk with his friend in the class. In this situation, making a severe reaction would be discouraging.
In conclusion, I believe that the system of education, the institute should concentrate their teaching method on encouraging students. However, mentioning destructive mistakes should be considered by them since a person who chooses a particular major are not aware of his decision.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, look, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 262.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34351145038 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0845457099 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1026136439 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105551577758 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028070359521 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696648985102 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822510353184 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113383769847 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.