some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people remind us of how important they are. others think we should always stay with others to have a good relationship because we can communicate with them more often.
interpersonal relationship is always subjected to the various controversies. A group of people inclines we should make a distance from friends to understand how significant they are in our life while some others tend to have a closed relationship and communicate with them more frequently. From my personal perspective, I believe that we should consolidate friendship ties and it is meaningless to being away from friends even for a short period of ti,e
first and foremost, the importance of people being achieved by our history and what they have done for us. A person that we know successfully has passed numerous experiments to call them a close friend. individuals were in different predicaments in the life and to got out of them, they got help from like-minded friends. It means that we should not turn a blind eye to their valuable works that they have done in our life. It should be stressed that human being 's mind often does not work efficiently and forgetting some events are plausible. In case of being in a dilemma whether a particular person is valuable to us or not, we just need to take a paper and list his dedications for us. If someone is worthwhile for us, he would definitely pass this evaluation too.
secondly, People have myriads connections in the course of life and majority of our human's network does not last for a long-time, since we had been in touch with them and after a while, we notice that there is no ground to make a relationship. Like-minded friends are those that we have built a relationship with them. Without any doubt, entering a new person into our life takes a lot of efforts and time to understand if they are reliable. Since public cannot live alone, being away from friends is equal to investment on newcomers and we do not need to because we already have ones.
In a nutshell, I believe that people should not unravel their friendship ties in order to understand how important they are
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Interpersonal
interpersonal relationship is always subjected to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...riendship ties and it is meaningless to being away from friends even for a short peri...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , e
...om friends even for a short period of ti,e first and foremost, the importance of ...
^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Individuals
...periments to call them a close friend. individuals were in different predicaments in the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... definitely pass this evaluation too. secondly, People have myriads connections in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der to understand how important they are
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72566371681 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8413863803 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9128618947 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417929959896 0.236089414692 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13659735136 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091956526919 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257483818969 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094943020322 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.