some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people remind us of how important they are. others think we should always stay with others to have a good relationship because we can communicate with them more often.
Interpersonal relationship is always subjected to the various controversies. A group of people inclines we should make a distance from friends to understand how significant they are in our life while some others tend to have a closed relationship and communicate with them more frequently. From my personal perspective, I believe that we should consolidate friendship ties and it is meaningless to being away from friends even for a short period of ti,e
first and foremost, our history with someone are the most considerable evidence we possess that reveals us the importance of a person. A person that we know successfully has passed numerous experiments to call him a close friend. It should be stressed that individuals were exposed to different predicaments in the life and they could not get out of it without advise and patronage of their close people around them. Accordingly, it is not fair to turn a blind eye to their valuable works that they have done in our life. As a matter of fact, human being 's mind often does not work efficiently and forgetting some events are plausible. In case of being in a dilemma whether a particular person is valuable for us or not, we just need to take a paper and list his dedications. If someone is worthwhile, he would pass this evaluation too definitely.
secondly, People have myriads connections in the course of life and majority of our human's network does not last for a long-time, since we had been in touch with them and after a while, we notice that there is no ground to make a relationship. Like-minded friends are those that we have built a relationship with them. Without any doubt, entering a new person into our life takes a lot of efforts and time to understand if they are reliable or not. Since public cannot live alone, being away from friends is equal to investment on newcomers and we do not need waste resources because we already have one.
In a nutshell, I believe that people should not diminish the bond between intimates in order to understand how important they are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...riendship ties and it is meaningless to being away from friends even for a short peri...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , e
...om friends even for a short period of ti,e first and foremost, our history with s...
^^
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... and foremost, our history with someone are the most considerable evidence we posse...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... pass this evaluation too definitely. secondly, People have myriads connections in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to waste'?
Suggestion: to waste
...estment on newcomers and we do not need waste resources because we already have one. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78531073446 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88533568073 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8402906855 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409284470643 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124661813784 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938798136539 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249488195855 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976169557718 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.