The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Of course it would be great for the whole humanity if we knew what is the best way to teach, which essentialy is the gift of being able to pass knowledge from one mind, the teacher, to another, the aprendice. Unfortunatelly, I am affraid we do not know this answear. Hence, I think that we cannot just praise positive actions and ignore negative ones as a way to effectively teach someone. this is not a good approach, and I am going to elaborate on this in what follows.
Firstly, I think that the learning is mostly on our errors. If we just get positive experiences, we will never ask ourselves if we are really prepared for facing every challenge, because it seems that we got all under control, all resolved. But the thing is, we are actually never prepared for everything: all day is a new challenge in real life. So when one does something wrong, or gets a negative aspect on something, it is best for him/her to know that, to have this notion of what needs to be corrected. And when you know you do not know everything, you let yourself open for receive information, you actually go after it, because after all, nobody wants to keep comiting the same mistakes. If our mistakes were just ignored, we may never know they were mistakes, and you keep them.
Another reason it is the fact that you could never know the difference between what is right and what is wrong. If all your negative actions would just ignored, you would never know they are wrong, therefore nothing would stop you from commiting them again. You could know that you did something positive, because you were praised by it, but this is not enough for you yo learn, in fact you wound not even go after knowledge if you thouhght you have it all.
Finally, when you are learning, especially something new to you, you probably do a lot more negative actions than positive actions. So you will keep commiting the same mistakes over and over, not even knowing it. It is much better having this notion and this self awareness of what you are doing, and how this is affecting you and the people around you. And this is not something that would happen if you only get praises for positive actions and nothing over negative ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... as a way to effectively teach someone. this is not a good approach, and I am going ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
...what is right and what is wrong. If all your negative actions would just ignored, yo...
^^^^
Line 13, column 332, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...oing, and how this is affecting you and the people around you. And this is not something that would h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, really, so, therefore, after all, i think, in fact, of course, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 33.0505617978 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56281407035 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40991450827 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482412060302 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7885164129 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.823529412 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330170508174 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115043269796 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095979284041 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220150703813 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764575867085 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.