Learning from the response that you get from your pals help you to ameliorate more. Both positive and negative response have their own roles, but when we take negative responses into consideration, we know more about the mistakes that would inadvertently happened and that we should avoid it to get a better result. Positive praises tell us about the point we are good at while negative praises tell us the point that we need to work on.
When we work on our goal, people tent to praise us based on our action. Positive praising help us to build our confidence, but too much of positive praising could result into over-confidence which might pull us away from our target. Negative praising on the other hand help us to boast up our esteem to prove that our goal is achievable.The negative praises sometimes sound caustic because many times they are referring to the mistakes that we make, but it depend on the individual perspective. Some may find them a bit denigrating while some take that as a learning experience, it varies from person to person, the important thing is we should accept them as it a response of the action that we had done.
Your negative actions act as the hurdles into your path of achievement. For example, formal cricketer Navjothsigh Siddhu was afraid of public speaking, many times he gave his wicket on the score of 99 just because he didn't want to face the reporters after completing his century. Many of his co-players ridiculed him and make fun of is weakness. He worked on his side of his personality and now Siddhu is one of the most popular Hindi/English commentator that we have in Cricket. This is the magic of negative praising.
As it is well said that "learn from you mistakes, it will guide towards your goal". The mistakes that you make is unknown to you until someone points that out. You should always admit the mistake and take the negative praising optimistically to improvise yourself
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...em to prove that our goal is achievable.The negative praises sometimes sound causti...
^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'depends'?
Suggestion: depends
...ng to the mistakes that we make, but it depend on the individual perspective. Some may...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: You're; You are
...onse of the action that we had done. Your negative actions act as the hurdles int...
^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: AFRAID_OF_HEIGHT[2]
Message: The noun should be probably in the plural form: 'speakings'.
Suggestion: speakings
...Navjothsigh Siddhu was afraid of public speaking, many times he gave his wicket on the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...cket on the score of 99 just because he didnt want to face the reporters after comple...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive praising optimistically to improvise yourself
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79821958457 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70457482222 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53412462908 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.023843187 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224742244604 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835137136389 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603781607614 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143388072657 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666000105518 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.