The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and neglect negative ones
Humans are wired to behave in two ways: the good way and the bad way. While a quorum of the former is praised through encomiums, public recognitions, presentation of award plaques, a lot of the latter which the perpetrators are meant to be scolded are overlooked. Looking into the society, the exultation of good behaviours has led other students to mimic these behaviours, thereby proliferating good acts in the society. this is also the same with pecadilloes that are ignored. Children imitate these acts, thereby increasing it conduct on a diurnal basis, and this is having detrimental effect on the society. Hence, while positive actions are to be continually praised, negative ones should never be looked.
Looking at the contemporary society, good behaviours such as getting high grades, assisting the weak and many other good characters are celebrated through gift endowment, scholarship and other good forms of acknowledgement. But misdemeanors such as kids throwing tantrums and bullying are basically ignored. While these might seem benign, they pose dangerous threat to our society such as kids becoming intransigient adults that are mostly to become miscreants. Punishing children with bad acts help check these acts from their childhood days, thereby helping to breed well-behaved students in the society.
At the national level, beneficence such as good governance and large altruism acts are acknowledged through public recognition, national awards and conferment of national titles. These praises stimulates the younger generation to emulate these good acts. Thus, increasing the amount of positive actions conducted in the society. On the other hand, miscreants are punished by either public opprobrium, long-term incarceration and demotion from public offices. Imagine these retributions are not put in place to qualify these acts; these bad actions will definitely be replicated everywhere. Ergo, making the society insufferable for the quotidian citizen.
On the contrary, some might quibble that it is pointless wasting time and resources in rebuking pecadilloes. This might be true to some extents as most negative actions excused seems to pose little to no threat on the society. But let us look at the long-term effect of overlooking these acts. The long-term effect of overlooking Osama Bin Laden’s actions led to the procreation of a national anarchist who caused the deracination of innumerable lives on September 11, 2001. Au contraire, the effect of correcting these bad acts as led to the society begetting prominent citizens such as Barrack Obama, Denzel Washington and George Bush.
In summary, good acts should always be praised and bad actions should never be ignored. While the long range effect of praising good actions is seen in the world today, the effect of ignoring bad actions is also seen in the amount of miscreants in the society.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...proliferating good acts in the society. this is also the same with pecadilloes that ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 531, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'conducts'?
Suggestion: conducts
...itate these acts, thereby increasing it conduct on a diurnal basis, and this is having ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'stimulate'.
Suggestion: stimulate
...rment of national titles. These praises stimulates the younger generation to emulate these...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, in summary, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39380530973 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90099847516 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511061946903 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9462951827 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.652173913 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60869565217 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126800614593 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040804045083 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581912727029 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080425395937 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525803708426 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...proliferating good acts in the society. this is also the same with pecadilloes that ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 531, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'conducts'?
Suggestion: conducts
...itate these acts, thereby increasing it conduct on a diurnal basis, and this is having ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'stimulate'.
Suggestion: stimulate
...rment of national titles. These praises stimulates the younger generation to emulate these...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, in summary, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39380530973 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90099847516 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511061946903 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9462951827 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.652173913 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60869565217 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126800614593 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040804045083 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581912727029 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080425395937 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525803708426 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.