The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or role models.
The upshot of given issue has multiple viewpoints and create a controversial situation. unquestionably, society chooses their role models and heroes who have similar liking and way of living. Nevertheless, the society's character can't be decided by their role models or heroes. Also, their role model's character might be what the society wants to acquire and their role models and heroes the ones who inspire them. Thus, I disagree with the statement aspect that society's character could be examined by their role models or heroes character.
Firstly, the character of the role model is what society wants to acquire. Basically, one's role model is the one who makes the person admire himself. For example, a person might see his friend as a role model. But here it is not necessary that the person has the same character as that of his friend. They liked his friend's character and the way he works around, and this makes the person admire his friend. If society does choose a role model or heroes according to the character then they won't inspire the society as the society already has what the other person has got and the society won't feel much about it. Thus, the character of the role model is what society wants to acquire.
Secondly, examining society's role models and heroes for their character is not the best way. Rather going and observing every individual and personally knowing them will give us more insight into the society's character. Moreover, we understand a person's character by being around him and observing how he behaves and treats others in various situations. For example, observing the person when he talks to an elderly person or how he interacts in public will tell us more about his/her character.
Undeniably, the society might have liking and character similar to their role models and heroes. But, this is not the case in all the situations and might fail in many other cases. The way we look at the role model differs from person to person and we can't claim that his role model's character is same as what his own character is like. Thus, it is quite obvious and using common sense, we can make out that there isn't any necessity to have same characters of both of them.
Thus, people character can't be summarized to a society's character as every individual has it's own way of thinking and reacting to a particular situation. We can't claim that the role models or heroes character is always what the society's character should be. As stated about the best way to get to know one's character is to personally know them. A character is the thing of personal asset and it would change from time to time and from person to person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unquestionably
...s and create a controversial situation. unquestionably, society chooses their role models and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...g. Nevertheless, the societys character cant be decided by their role models or hero...
^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...at society wants to acquire. Basically, ones role model is the one who makes the per...
^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...or their character is not the best way. Rather going and observing every individual an...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ys character. Moreover, we understand a persons character by being around him and obser...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...el differs from person to person and we cant claim that his role models character is...
^^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ommon sense, we can make out that there isnt any necessity to have same characters o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 24, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...both of them. Thus, people character cant be summarized to a societys character a...
^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... reacting to a particular situation. We cant claim that the role models or heroes ch...
^^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... what the societys character should be. As stated about the best way to get to kno...
^^
Line 9, column 303, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tated about the best way to get to know ones character is to personally know them. A...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77056277056 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44939410733 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402597402597 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2364216218 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8333333333 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412671439136 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164294825969 0.0831039109588 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124951158431 0.0758088955206 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276270764474 0.150359130593 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610649466259 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.