The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Stating that the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women the society chooses as its heroes or its role models, this view asserts that character of a society's heroes is important indicator of our society's character. In some senses, socially accepted people tend to have the characters which most of composer of the society want to resemble and like. In my point, however, the characters of role-models could not always show a society's values.
Of course, few would disagree that respected people have socially pervasive trait. People tend to like persons whether he or she is real or virtual, because the person do things that common people want to do but can't do. For example, in US, comic book's heroes such Super man, Captain America, Bat man have been very popular. They did good behaviors in comic books which resist against evil villain, war, Communism, or even the governments. Most popular characters also have been change d as time pass, following social issues which the public have interested in. This implies that the socially popular characters or people reflect the public's point of view
Nonetheless, these persons would not actually mean the real interest of a country. These people do not follow socially pervasive values but could be fabricated by political intention. In human history, there are many examples that show politically made heroes for certain purpose of the politicians. To claim the war, the politicians made the victim who specious look killed by and enemy even genocide their own people. This shows that socially respected people are not actually representative of general people.
Moreover, the characters which so-called 'saint' have would only hope of a society, not actually it have. For example, although Mother Teresa who had helped poor people in India was praised and even called as saint, There are only few people who did really actions to help poor people around them or abroad. In this example, we can see that the characters they have in only hope for the public to want to have.
In conclusion, it is not deniable that our role-models partially reflects our values. However, considering tailored heroes in history and that there are few actions in response to their loyal activity, the character of heroes would not show the society's trait well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hings that common people want to do but cant do. For example, in US, comic books her...
^^^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people reflect the publics point of view Nonetheless, these persons would not act...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...only hope of a society, not actually it have. For example, although Mother Teresa wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, look, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, well, for example, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02551020408 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53038079093 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507653061224 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9990997858 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304998284051 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902933353981 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184866816024 0.0758088955206 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19184350103 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.253744165326 0.0667264976115 380% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.