Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.
Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of an action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing that action.
How does one actually define a moral act? An act is generally demarcated by thin line, which makes it either right or wrong. Moral act is the one which is considered absolutely right in every aspect and therefore, legal by law whereas the wrong act, which injures or harms someone else can be termed as an immoral act, performed against the conscience of a person. Well, any action is performed with the final result in mind, and the implication of the results on the person who performs the action. Henceforth, the intentions of the person performing the deed are more important than the amount of good or bad the action generates.
Generally, a moral act is considered correct or incorrect based on the intent of the person doing the act as the ulterior motives of a person drives him/ her to perform the act. Without any gains from the act, no person generally performs a particular act. In short, no good deed is done selflessly or without a motive. Well, proponents of charitable organizations or any benevolent person would surely like to contradict the above statement. But the truth is that when people donate, more often during the festive seasons, they do charity to help the poor or those in need which ends up with a modicum of satisfaction that evokes happiness inside the benevolent, as a result proving that the good charitable deed was not done selflessly or with the intent of leaving the donor satisfied or happy or playing a vital role in helping the society. However, the good deed resulted into more amount of good than bad, to all the people associated with the good deed- the charitable organization, the poor and none the least the person himself, but in no way does that define the act as moral or not. But a good motive surely defines a moral act.
An organization run by the citizens of an entire country, which may have followers of lakhs plans to kill a group of few people working in press who published articles against their religion. The act may possibly have done well to all the followers of the religion, as they might think that killing those few press people was indeed of teaching a good lesson to all the people round the globe. But, the lives of few people at the press was quantitatively lesser compared to the people who ought happiness out of the mass murder. Does this measure of quantitatively defining a moral or immoral act correct? Surely, No. Hence, the judicial system more often makes the decision of punishing any act based on the intention of the doer, rather than the amount of good or bad it generates
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...rticles against their religion. The act may possibly have done well to all the followers of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...rticles against their religion. The act may possibly have done well to all the followers of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'whereas', 'in short', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217038539554 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.139959432049 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0973630831643 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0547667342799 0.0497285424764 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0162271805274 0.0444667217837 36% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125760649087 0.12292977631 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0507099391481 0.0406280797675 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56515076237 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0162271805274 0.030933414821 52% => OK
Particles: 0.00202839756592 0.0016655270985 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.162271805274 0.0997080785238 163% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0121703853955 0.0249443105267 49% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0223123732252 0.0148568991511 150% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2563.0 2732.02544248 94% => OK
No of words: 452.0 452.878318584 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6703539823 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.311946902655 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.212389380531 0.280924506359 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.146017699115 0.200843997647 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103982300885 0.132149295362 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56515076237 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477876106195 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 53.6175573731 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.1111111111 23.380412469 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.6653871965 59.4972553346 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.388888889 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 23.380412469 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.674092028746 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.3500491642 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.86538461538 1.64882698954 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.590191788701 0.391690518653 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.196163531161 0.123202303941 159% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.146972521772 0.077325440228 190% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52097774385 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.248653266847 0.149214159877 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.234991605917 0.161403998019 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184070545927 0.0892212321368 206% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.647333121216 0.385218514788 168% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0156105033149 0.0692045440612 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.478884790955 0.275328986314 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483406232908 0.0653680567796 74% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.