Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.
Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing the action.
The speaker claims that any action can be attributed morally correct if it produces more positive outcomes than negative. To support this claim, the speaker states that the result of the action is more important than the intent of the person or people performing the action while judging it's morality. Authors claim may seem flawless. But actually the amount of good or bad happened in any action is subjective according to point of view of others. If any action brings good for everyone around then it can be said only results are important, no one needs to pay heed to who and why is doing this work. But in most of the cases, to completely judge any action's morality, intention may be same important as result.
In corporate culture, success depends on it's profitability. If the company is making high amount of profit, then it's good for company. But that doesn't simply imply that all the actions taken to make profit can be imputed as morally correct. Company's high profitability may be attributed to economic growth of country but it may also happen that it's paying workers less than minimum wage rate or causing harm to environment. In such cases, though it may seem that a profitable company is bringing positive outcomes by creating jobs or affecting economic growth doesn't make all their actions morally corect. To judge their actions' morality, it should be considered their whole operating condition i.e. how they are making profit.
From ancient time, the world has seen a lot of philanthropists who wanted to change the world in a positive way. Although most of the philanthropists actually care about the world, everyone don't. A lot of people take part into philanthophic work just to reach hidden self goal or just to create a veneer between dark side of that people. A lot of corrupted people who seem very generous at first, have been exposed. Maybe they are just stepping towards their personal goal by showing the world their generosity. In recent days, it has been also seen that several philanthopists have been accused of various criminal activities. So, to consider moral judgement of any action, it is good to find out why this action has been taken and who is behind all these.
Social tradion is, most of the time, not considering anything while any action seems to bring good. But, the consequences of these actions should be considered. Just by judging while the action is bringing good, it should't be said that the action is morally correct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e result of the action is more important than the intent of the person or people ...
^^
Line 1, column 655, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'actions'' or 'action's'?
Suggestion: actions'; action's
...t of the cases, to completely judge any actions morality, intention may be same importa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...it, then its good for company. But that doesnt simply imply that all the actions taken...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ating jobs or affecting economic growth doesnt make all their actions morally corect. ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hropists who wanted to change the world in a positive way. Although most of the philanthropists a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...actually care about the world, everyone dont. A lot of people take part into philant...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57698613633 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51536643026 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9027182547 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363089949453 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111843896582 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105645027563 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233326578194 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123758397431 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.